Files
cowork-local/application/model_routing/routing_models.py
T
f9f6bc01fd
CI / test (push) Canceled after 0s
Feature/delta team/epic r04 (#7)
## Summary

epic r04 - begin refactor

## Change Type

- [x] Cowork feature
- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Core AI contribution
- [ ] Test / hardening
- [ ] Performance
- [ ] Documentation

## Related Work

Cowork Task:

Core Repo: http://34.143.229.138/gitea-admin/fsg-ai-core-assets

Core AI Issue:

Core Task:

Related PR:

## Scope

What is intentionally included?

What is intentionally NOT included?

## Validation

- [ ] Unit tests
- [ ] Integration tests
- [ ] Manual verification
- [ ] Regression check

Commands / evidence:

## Security Impact

Permission / credential / network / customer data impact:

## Compatibility

- [ ] No breaking change
- [ ] Breaking change documented

## Reviewer Notes

Anything Cowork reviewers should pay attention to.

---------

Co-authored-by: Anh Tran Nguyen Minh <anhtnm1@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Huong Le Thi Thien <huongltt35@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Nam Pham Dinh Thanh <nampdt@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Vu Dam Tuan <vudt15@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Hiep Ha Van <hiephv3@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Lam Hoang Van <lamhv7@fpt.com>
Reviewed-on: #7
Co-authored-by: Duy Le Huu <duylh19@fpt.com>
2026-08-31 05:15:13 +00:00

159 lines
6.3 KiB
Python

"""Pure-Python DTOs exchanged with :mod:`routing_application_service`.
These types are the vocabulary the chat surfaces (Cowork chat, Co4E, AI-Edit)
now speak instead of each re-deriving routing state from raw config lookups and
``core/routing`` internals.
Layer rules (``docs/architecture/ADR-001-layered-architecture.md``): application
code is 100% pure Python. Nothing here imports PySide6, and nothing here imports
``core.routing`` either — the concrete routing engine is reached only through
the adapter in :mod:`core_routing_adapter`, which keeps this module trivially
testable with plain fakes.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import Any, Optional, Tuple
class RoutingMode(str, Enum):
"""The four routing behaviours a surface can be in (R03-T03).
``OFF``/``AUTO``/``MANUAL`` map 1:1 onto the existing per-surface toggle and
onto ``core/routing/models.py::SwitchMode``. ``FALLBACK`` is new and
deliberately NOT an optimisation mode: it keeps whatever model the user
chose and only re-routes when that model cannot serve the turn, which is the
behaviour a resilience-minded workspace wants (never surprise me, but never
leave me stuck either).
"""
OFF = "off"
AUTO = "auto"
MANUAL = "manual"
FALLBACK = "fallback"
@classmethod
def parse(cls, raw: Any, default: "RoutingMode" = None) -> "RoutingMode":
"""Best-effort coercion from config/UI strings.
Routing must never break a turn, so an unrecognised value degrades to
``default`` (``OFF`` unless told otherwise) instead of raising — the same
defensive posture ``config.routing_mode_for`` already takes.
"""
fallback = default if default is not None else cls.OFF
if isinstance(raw, cls):
return raw
try:
return cls(str(raw or "").strip().lower())
except ValueError:
return fallback
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class RoutingRequest:
"""Everything needed to decide how ONE turn should be routed.
Frozen: the request is captured from live UI state (the selected model, the
typed prompt) and then handed to code that may run on a worker thread. An
immutable snapshot means the user changing the model picker mid-turn cannot
retroactively alter the decision that was already made — the same rationale
behind R04's ``ConversationExecutionRequest``.
"""
surface: str # "cowork" | "co4e" | "ai_edit" | ...
prompt: str # the user's text; drives task classification
current_provider: str # provider the surface would use as-is
current_model: str = "" # model the surface would use ("" = provider default)
mode: Optional[RoutingMode] = None # explicit override; None -> resolve per surface
# Pre-classified task type ("coding", "qa", ...). AI-Edit always knows its
# turns are coding work, so it pins this and skips prompt classification.
task_type: Optional[str] = None
required_capabilities: Tuple[str, ...] = () # e.g. ("vision",)
@property
def has_prompt(self) -> bool:
"""Whether there is anything to classify. An empty prompt cannot be
routed meaningfully, so every surface short-circuits on it."""
return bool((self.prompt or "").strip())
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class RouteEvaluation:
"""A routing engine's verdict, normalised away from ``core/routing`` types.
The adapter flattens ``RouteResult``/``SwitchDecision`` into these plain
fields so the application service never touches Pydantic models or enums
owned by another layer. ``decision`` still carries the original object
because the Manual-mode confirm dialog renders its ``reason``.
"""
task_type: str
should_switch: bool
target_provider: Optional[str] = None
target_model: Optional[str] = None
score_gain: float = 0.0
reason: str = ""
# False when the currently selected model is not a usable candidate for this
# task (unranked, unavailable, or failed its last probe) — the single signal
# FALLBACK mode acts on.
current_is_usable: bool = True
decision: Any = None # original SwitchDecision, for the UI dialog
@property
def has_target(self) -> bool:
"""A switch is only actionable when the engine named a model to move to."""
return bool(self.target_model or self.target_provider)
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class RoutingOutcome:
"""What the calling surface should actually do for this turn.
A surface needs exactly three things from routing — "which provider/model do
I build?", "do I tell the user?" and "was I told to stand down?" — so those
are the fields here, and nothing else. ``provider``/``model`` are ``None``
when the surface should keep its own selection untouched.
"""
mode: RoutingMode
switched: bool = False
provider: Optional[str] = None
model: Optional[str] = None
task_type: str = ""
score_gain: float = 0.0
reason: str = ""
# True when Manual mode proposed a switch and the user declined or the
# confirmation timed out. Distinct from "no switch proposed" so a surface
# can tell "routing had nothing to offer" from "the user said no".
declined: bool = False
decision: Any = field(default=None, repr=False)
@property
def should_notify(self) -> bool:
"""Whether the surface should post the "switched model" status bubble.
Only an executed switch is worth interrupting the transcript for."""
return self.switched
@classmethod
def keep_current(
cls,
mode: RoutingMode,
*,
reason: str = "",
task_type: str = "",
declined: bool = False,
decision: Any = None,
) -> "RoutingOutcome":
"""The no-change outcome — the single constructor for every path that
leaves the surface's own model selection in place (routing off, empty
prompt, no better candidate, user declined, internal error)."""
return cls(
mode=mode, switched=False, provider=None, model=None,
task_type=task_type, reason=reason, declined=declined, decision=decision,
)
__all__ = ["RoutingMode", "RoutingRequest", "RouteEvaluation", "RoutingOutcome"]