Files
cowork-local/core/routing/service.py
T
f9f6bc01fd
CI / test (push) Canceled after 0s
Feature/delta team/epic r04 (#7)
## Summary

epic r04 - begin refactor

## Change Type

- [x] Cowork feature
- [ ] Bug fix
- [ ] Core AI contribution
- [ ] Test / hardening
- [ ] Performance
- [ ] Documentation

## Related Work

Cowork Task:

Core Repo: http://34.143.229.138/gitea-admin/fsg-ai-core-assets

Core AI Issue:

Core Task:

Related PR:

## Scope

What is intentionally included?

What is intentionally NOT included?

## Validation

- [ ] Unit tests
- [ ] Integration tests
- [ ] Manual verification
- [ ] Regression check

Commands / evidence:

## Security Impact

Permission / credential / network / customer data impact:

## Compatibility

- [ ] No breaking change
- [ ] Breaking change documented

## Reviewer Notes

Anything Cowork reviewers should pay attention to.

---------

Co-authored-by: Anh Tran Nguyen Minh <anhtnm1@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Huong Le Thi Thien <huongltt35@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Nam Pham Dinh Thanh <nampdt@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Vu Dam Tuan <vudt15@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Hiep Ha Van <hiephv3@fpt.com>
Co-authored-by: Lam Hoang Van <lamhv7@fpt.com>
Reviewed-on: #7
Co-authored-by: Duy Le Huu <duylh19@fpt.com>
2026-08-31 05:15:13 +00:00

376 lines
15 KiB
Python

"""RoutingService — the façade the UI (and the "REST-equivalent" API) talk to.
It wires the pieces together and holds the per-app state (assessment store +
pending-switch registry). It is deliberately **Qt-free and thread-safe** so it
can run from a chat worker thread, the scheduler, or a test. The UI layer adds
the toggle widget and the Manual-mode confirm dialog on top of these methods.
Logical API surface (mirrors the task's REST endpoints):
* :meth:`reassess` ↔ ``POST /models/reassess``
* :meth:`best_for` ↔ ``GET /models/best``
* :meth:`assessments` / :meth:`status` ↔ ``GET /models/assessments``
* :meth:`add_candidate` ↔ ``POST /models/add``
* :meth:`route` ↔ the decision half of ``POST /task/execute``
* :meth:`create_pending` / :meth:`resolve_pending` ↔ ``POST /task/confirm-switch``
* :meth:`get_routing_config` / :meth:`update_routing_config` ↔ ``/routing/config``
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import logging
import threading
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Any, Callable, Dict, List, Optional, Tuple
from .classifier import classify
from .clients import AppProbeClient, ProbeClient
from .models import (
ModelAssessment,
PendingSwitch,
Policy,
SwitchDecision,
SwitchMode,
TaskType,
candidate_key,
split_key,
)
from .orchestrator import Candidate, check_and_update
from .prober import make_judge
from .selector import Ranking, rank_models
from .store import AssessmentStore
from .switch_controller import Executor, PendingSwitchRegistry, decide
logger = logging.getLogger("cowork_local.routing")
# A sensible cheap judge model per known provider, used when the user hasn't
# pinned one in Settings. Falls back to the provider's own configured model.
_CHEAP_JUDGE_MODEL = {
"anthropic": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
"codex": "gpt-4o-mini",
"github_copilot": "gpt-4o-mini",
"openai_compat": "", # unknown gateway → use configured model
"ollama": "", # local → use configured model
}
@dataclass
class RouteResult:
"""Outcome of routing one turn (before any execution)."""
mode: SwitchMode
task_type: TaskType
decision: SwitchDecision
ranking: Optional[Ranking] = None
@property
def should_switch(self) -> bool:
"""Có nên đổi sang model khác cho lượt này không."""
return self.decision.should_switch
@property
def needs_confirmation(self) -> bool:
"""Manual mode with a worthwhile switch → the UI must ask the user."""
return self.mode == SwitchMode.MANUAL and self.decision.should_switch
def target(self) -> Optional[Tuple[str, str]]:
"""The (provider, model_id) to switch to, or None."""
if not self.decision.to_model:
return None
return split_key(self.decision.to_model)
class RoutingService:
"""Central routing coordinator, one per :class:`AppContext`."""
def __init__(
self,
ctx: Any,
*,
store: Optional[AssessmentStore] = None,
client: Optional[ProbeClient] = None,
clock: Optional[Callable[[], float]] = None,
) -> None:
"""``store``/``client``/``clock`` đều tiêm được: test thay đồng hồ để tua thời
gian mà không phải chờ thật, và thay client để không gọi mạng.
"""
self.ctx = ctx
self.store = store or AssessmentStore()
self._client = client # None → lazily build AppProbeClient(ctx)
import time as _time
self.pending = PendingSwitchRegistry(clock=clock or _time.time)
self._reassess_lock = threading.Lock()
self._reassessing = False
# -- config helpers ------------------------------------------------- #
@property
def _routing_cfg(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Nhóm cấu hình định tuyến hiện tại."""
return self.ctx.config.routing
def get_routing_config(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Current routing behaviour config (for ``GET /routing/config``)."""
return dict(self._routing_cfg)
def update_routing_config(self, **changes) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Patch routing config (``PATCH /routing/config``) and persist.
Only known keys are accepted; unknown keys are ignored so a typo can't
silently poison the config.
"""
cfg = self._routing_cfg
allowed = {
"switch_mode", "policy", "min_score_gain", "confirm_timeout_sec",
"reassess_interval_hours", "per_provider_concurrency",
"judge_provider", "judge_model", "auto_reassess_on_add",
}
for k, v in changes.items():
if k in allowed:
cfg[k] = v
self.ctx.config.save()
return dict(cfg)
def _policy(self) -> Policy:
"""Chính sách chấm điểm đang chọn; giá trị lạ thì rơi về 'balanced'."""
raw = (self._routing_cfg.get("policy") or "balanced").lower()
try:
return Policy(raw)
except ValueError:
return Policy.BALANCED
def _client_or_build(self) -> ProbeClient:
"""Client dò model, dựng lười để chưa bật định tuyến thì không tốn gì."""
if self._client is None:
self._client = AppProbeClient(self.ctx)
return self._client
def _resolve_judge(self) -> Tuple[str, str]:
"""Which (provider, model) grades every probe.
Uses the pinned judge from config when set, else a cheap default for
the active provider (falling back to that provider's configured model).
"""
cfg = self._routing_cfg
provider = cfg.get("judge_provider") or self.ctx.config.active_provider
model = cfg.get("judge_model") or ""
if not model:
model = _CHEAP_JUDGE_MODEL.get(provider, "")
if not model:
model = self.ctx.config.provider_conf(provider).get("model", "")
return provider, model
# -- candidates ----------------------------------------------------- #
def candidates(self) -> List[Candidate]:
"""The models to assess: explicit ``routing.candidates`` plus each
provider's currently-configured model (so the model in use is always
scored). Deduplicated, order-stable."""
out: List[Candidate] = []
seen = set()
def _add(provider: str, model_id: str, tier: Optional[str]) -> None:
"""Thêm một ứng viên (provider, model) vào danh sách, bỏ qua mục thiếu thông tin
hoặc trùng.
"""
if not provider or not model_id:
return
key = candidate_key(provider, model_id)
if key in seen:
return
seen.add(key)
out.append((provider, model_id, tier))
for c in self._routing_cfg.get("candidates") or []:
if isinstance(c, dict):
_add(c.get("provider", ""), c.get("model_id", ""), c.get("tier"))
# Always include each configured provider's active model.
for name, conf in (self.ctx.config.data.get("providers") or {}).items():
_add(name, conf.get("model", ""), None)
return out
def add_candidate(
self,
provider: str,
model_id: str,
tier: Optional[str] = None,
*,
reassess: Optional[bool] = None,
) -> bool:
"""Add a model to the assessed set (``POST /models/add``).
Returns True if it was newly added. When ``reassess`` (defaults to the
``auto_reassess_on_add`` config) is True, kicks off a background
reassess so the new model gets scored right away.
"""
cfg = self._routing_cfg
cand = cfg.setdefault("candidates", [])
key = candidate_key(provider, model_id)
if any(candidate_key(c.get("provider", ""), c.get("model_id", "")) == key
for c in cand if isinstance(c, dict)):
return False
cand.append({"provider": provider, "model_id": model_id, "tier": tier})
self.ctx.config.save()
do_reassess = cfg.get("auto_reassess_on_add", True) if reassess is None else reassess
if do_reassess:
self.reassess_background()
return True
# -- assessment run ------------------------------------------------- #
def reassess(
self,
policy: Optional[Policy] = None,
*,
client: Optional[ProbeClient] = None,
) -> Dict[str, ModelAssessment]:
"""Run a full assessment (blocking). Safe to call from a worker thread.
Guarded so two reassessments never run at once (a second call while one
is in flight is a no-op returning the current store)."""
with self._reassess_lock:
if self._reassessing:
logger.info("routing.reassess: already running — skipping duplicate")
return self.store.load()
self._reassessing = True
try:
policy = policy or self._policy()
judge_provider, judge_model = self._resolve_judge()
cli = client or self._client_or_build()
if not judge_model:
logger.warning("routing.reassess: no judge model resolved — aborting")
return self.store.load()
return check_and_update(
self.candidates(), cli,
judge_provider=judge_provider, judge_model=judge_model,
store=self.store, config=self.ctx.config, policy=policy,
per_provider_concurrency=int(self._routing_cfg.get("per_provider_concurrency", 2)),
)
finally:
with self._reassess_lock:
self._reassessing = False
def reassess_background(
self,
policy: Optional[Policy] = None,
on_done: Optional[Callable[[Dict[str, ModelAssessment]], None]] = None,
) -> threading.Thread:
"""Run :meth:`reassess` on a daemon thread (non-Qt, headless-safe)."""
def _run() -> None:
"""Chạy nền: chấm điểm lại danh mục model.
Nuốt mọi ngoại lệ có chủ ý — một lần chấm điểm hỏng không được phép làm
chết ứng dụng, vì đây là việc chạy ngầm người dùng không yêu cầu.
"""
try:
result = self.reassess(policy)
except Exception: # noqa: BLE001 — never let a reassess crash the app
logger.exception("routing.reassess background run failed")
result = {}
if on_done is not None:
try:
on_done(result)
except Exception: # noqa: BLE001
logger.exception("routing.reassess on_done callback failed")
t = threading.Thread(target=_run, name="routing-reassess", daemon=True)
t.start()
return t
def is_reassessing(self) -> bool:
"""Có đang chấm điểm lại danh mục model hay không."""
return self._reassessing
# -- query ---------------------------------------------------------- #
def assessments(self) -> Dict[str, ModelAssessment]:
"""Bảng điểm model đã lưu, đọc từ kho đánh giá."""
return self.store.load()
def status(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""``GET /models/assessments`` — last_updated + per-model summary."""
assessments = self.store.load()
return {
"last_updated": self.store.last_updated(),
"policy": self.store.policy(),
"count": len(assessments),
"models": sorted(assessments.keys()),
}
def best_for(
self,
task_type: TaskType,
policy: Optional[Policy] = None,
*,
required_capabilities: Optional[List[str]] = None,
) -> Ranking:
"""Ranking + best model for a task type (``GET /models/best``)."""
policy = policy or self._policy()
return rank_models(
self.store.load().values(), task_type, policy,
required_capabilities=required_capabilities,
)
# -- routing decision ----------------------------------------------- #
def route(
self,
surface: str,
prompt: str,
current_provider: str,
current_model: str,
*,
mode_override: Optional[str] = None,
required_capabilities: Optional[List[str]] = None,
task_type: Optional[TaskType] = None,
) -> RouteResult:
"""Decide whether/how to switch models for one turn on ``surface``.
Does NOT execute anything — returns a :class:`RouteResult` the caller
acts on (Auto → switch & run; Manual+should_switch → confirm; else run
as-is). Never raises: any internal failure yields an Off/no-switch
result so a broken assessment store can't block chatting.
"""
try:
mode = (mode_override or self.ctx.config.routing_mode_for(surface) or "off").lower()
mode_enum = SwitchMode(mode) if mode in ("off", "auto", "manual") else SwitchMode.OFF
tt = task_type or classify(prompt)
current_key = candidate_key(current_provider, current_model) if current_model else None
if mode_enum == SwitchMode.OFF:
decision = decide(current_key, rank_models([], tt), SwitchMode.OFF, 0.0, task_type=tt)
return RouteResult(mode=mode_enum, task_type=tt, decision=decision)
policy = self._policy()
ranking = rank_models(
self.store.load().values(), tt, policy,
required_capabilities=required_capabilities,
)
min_gain = float(self._routing_cfg.get("min_score_gain", 0.05) or 0.0)
decision = decide(current_key, ranking, mode_enum, min_gain, task_type=tt)
return RouteResult(mode=mode_enum, task_type=tt, decision=decision, ranking=ranking)
except Exception: # noqa: BLE001 — routing must never break a chat turn
logger.exception("routing.route failed — falling back to no-switch")
tt = task_type or TaskType.QA
current_key = candidate_key(current_provider, current_model) if current_model else None
decision = decide(current_key, rank_models([], tt), SwitchMode.OFF, 0.0, task_type=tt)
return RouteResult(mode=SwitchMode.OFF, task_type=tt, decision=decision)
# -- manual pending switches ---------------------------------------- #
def create_pending(self, decision: SwitchDecision, task_payload: Dict) -> PendingSwitch:
"""Register a Manual-mode proposal awaiting the user's confirm."""
timeout = float(self._routing_cfg.get("confirm_timeout_sec", 60) or 60)
return self.pending.create(decision, task_payload, timeout)
def resolve_pending(self, request_id: str, approve: bool, run: Executor) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Confirm/reject a pending switch (idempotent) — ``POST /task/confirm-switch``."""
return self.pending.resolve(request_id, approve, run)
def get_pending(self, request_id: str) -> Optional[PendingSwitch]:
"""Đề nghị đổi model đang chờ người dùng xác nhận; ``None`` nếu không có."""
return self.pending.get(request_id)
def sweep_pending(self) -> List[str]:
"""Expire overdue pending switches (called periodically by the scheduler)."""
return self.pending.sweep_expired()
__all__ = ["RoutingService", "RouteResult"]