Files
CASAN/AINative_OKR_CASAN5/packages/casan-harness/templates/spec-template.md
T
thanhnvandClaude Opus 4.8 664bd1f00c feat(plan-01): Phase 1 — relocate harness code to packages/casan-harness (symlink facade)
Physically move the pure-code subtrees out of .specify into the package, leaving
compat symlinks at the old .specify/<dir> paths so every existing reference (internal
CASAN_HARNESS_ROOT + external CI/docker/mjs) keeps resolving. Runtime state stays put.

Moved (git mv): scripts/ tests/ security/ templates/ config/ governance/ memory/
  .specify/<dir>  ->  packages/casan-harness/<dir>   (+ .specify/<dir> symlink)
Stays in .specify (state/governance/domain, handled later): logs/ agentops/ level5/
  init-options.json traceability-map.json

Python `.resolve()` self-location followed the compat symlink into packages and lost
the app root; generate-casan-demo-context.py, generate-agentops-dashboard.py and
dashboard-server.py now walk UP for the `.specify` state marker instead of a fixed
parent depth (fixes "missing trace files" in run-casan4).

Full gate: PASS=64 FAIL=0 SKIP=3 (CASAN_CI_STEP_TIMEOUT_SEC=1200 — track-a ~450s runs
close to the 600s default and can tip over under load; this is timing variance, not a
regression — it passed cleanly with headroom). Runtime log/audit artifacts kept unstaged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 00:06:00 +09:00

5.1 KiB

Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]

Feature Branch: [###-feature-name]
Created: [DATE]
Status: Draft
Input: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"

Write this specification in requirement language only. Focus on what the system must do and why the behavior matters. Do not choose a technical stack or implementation approach unless the input explicitly mandates it.

User Scenarios & Testing (mandatory)

Test-First Delivery Rules

  • [Document the non-negotiable TDD rules for this feature]

User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)

[Describe this user journey in plain language]

Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]

Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]

Acceptance Scenarios:

  1. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]
  2. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]

User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)

[Describe this user journey in plain language]

Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]

Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently]

Acceptance Scenarios:

  1. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]

User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)

[Describe this user journey in plain language]

Why this priority: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]

Independent Test: [Describe how this can be tested independently]

Acceptance Scenarios:

  1. Given [initial state], When [action], Then [expected outcome]

[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]

Edge Cases

  • What happens when [boundary condition]?
  • How does system handle [error scenario]?

Requirements (mandatory)

Functional Requirements

  • FR-001: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
  • FR-002: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
  • FR-003: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
  • FR-004: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
  • FR-005: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]

Clarifications Needed

  • CL-001: [Describe unresolved requirement and why it blocks or constrains design]

Example of marking unclear requirements:

  • FR-006: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
  • FR-007: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]

Key Entities (include if feature involves data)

  • [Entity 1]: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
  • [Entity 2]: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]

Success Criteria (mandatory)

Measurable Outcomes

  • SC-001: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
  • SC-002: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
  • SC-003: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
  • SC-004: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]