thanhnvandClaude Opus 4.8
36a4812ef3
Standard production layout: the OKR app (was nested under AINative_OKR_CASAN5/) is now
the repository root. No more wrapper directory.
- Promote AINative_OKR_CASAN5/* -> repo root (backend/ frontend/ packages/ apps/
.specify/ docs/ infra/ nginx/ scripts/ + configs). Merge tool dirs: .gitea (kept the
active deploy ci.yml, added harness-ci.yml + runbooks), .claude (agents/commands +
launch.json), .github moved up.
- Remove redundant: 00_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE, scattered root notes (FPT_CASAN_Full.md,
tu-tuong-casan.md, casan-tu-sinh..., casan_harness_assessment.md, source-review...,
README_CASAN5_REFINED.md), casan-next-plans/ and optimize-docs/ (competition/planning
artifacts — roadmap + design history preserved in git log / commit messages).
- Update all references to the old layout:
- .gitea/workflows/{ci,harness-ci}.yml, .github/workflows/{ci,deploy}.yml:
working-directory .; drop AINative_OKR_CASAN5/ prefix; .specify/{tests,scripts}
-> packages/casan-harness/... (.specify/logs state kept)
- .claude/launch.json, .gitea/*-runbook.md: path prefixes
- CLAUDE.md, README.md: docs/input -> apps/okr/domain/input
- policy-bundle.yaml: 8 policy paths -> packages/casan-harness/...; manifest re-signed
- secrets-scan.sh: fixture excludes -> new package/domain paths.
Full gate from the new root: PASS=64 FAIL=0 SKIP=3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
109 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
109 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
|
|
|
|
**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
|
|
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit.plan` command. See `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` for the execution workflow.
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
|
|
|
|
## Technical Context
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the content in this section with the technical details
|
|
for the project. The structure here is presented in advisory capacity to guide
|
|
the iteration process.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
**Language/Version**: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
**Primary Dependencies**: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
**Storage**: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
|
|
**Testing**: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
**Target Platform**: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
**Project Type**: [e.g., library/cli/web-service/mobile-app/compiler/desktop-app or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
|
|
|
|
## Constitution Check
|
|
|
|
*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
|
|
|
|
- Requirement-first scope is preserved: the plan resolves implementation only for behavior already justified by the spec.
|
|
- All unresolved business rules from spec.md are either clarified or explicitly carried as constraints; none are silently assumed.
|
|
- Strict TDD is enforceable: for every story, the plan identifies the tests that will be written first before implementation begins.
|
|
- Stories remain independently testable and traceable to user roles, business workflow steps, and acceptance scenarios.
|
|
- Technical decisions included here are limited to mandated constraints or decisions necessary to implement approved behavior.
|
|
|
|
## Project Structure
|
|
|
|
### Documentation (this feature)
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
specs/[###-feature]/
|
|
├── plan.md # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
|
|
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
|
|
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
|
|
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
|
|
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
|
|
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Source Code (repository root)
|
|
<!--
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the placeholder tree below with the concrete layout
|
|
for this feature. Delete unused options and expand the chosen structure with
|
|
real paths (e.g., apps/admin, packages/something). The delivered plan must
|
|
not include Option labels.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
|
|
src/
|
|
├── models/
|
|
├── services/
|
|
├── cli/
|
|
└── lib/
|
|
|
|
tests/
|
|
├── contract/
|
|
├── integration/
|
|
└── unit/
|
|
|
|
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
|
|
backend/
|
|
├── src/
|
|
│ ├── models/
|
|
│ ├── services/
|
|
│ └── api/
|
|
└── tests/
|
|
|
|
frontend/
|
|
├── src/
|
|
│ ├── components/
|
|
│ ├── pages/
|
|
│ └── services/
|
|
└── tests/
|
|
|
|
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
|
|
api/
|
|
└── [same as backend above]
|
|
|
|
ios/ or android/
|
|
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Structure Decision**: [Document the selected structure and reference the real
|
|
directories captured above]
|
|
|
|
## Complexity Tracking
|
|
|
|
> **Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified**
|
|
|
|
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|
|
|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
|
|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
|
|
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |
|