Files
CASAN/packages/casan-harness/templates/plan-template.md
T
thanhnvandClaude Opus 4.8 18997caf49 docs: align all documentation with the new repo structure
Update agent protocols (.claude/agents, .github/agents), guides, runbooks and READMEs
to the post-restructure layout: .specify/{scripts,tests,security,config,templates,
governance,memory,level5-config} -> packages/casan-harness/...; docs/input +
golden-runs + traceability-map -> apps/okr/domain/...; drop AINative_OKR_CASAN5/ prefix.
Runtime-state paths (.specify/logs, .specify/agentops, .specify/level5/central-governance)
kept as-is. Historical evidence under docs/output/ left untouched (immutable run records).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 14:36:27 +09:00

4.3 KiB

Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]

Branch: [###-feature-name] | Date: [DATE] | Spec: [link] Input: Feature specification from /specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md

Note: This template is filled in by the /speckit.plan command. See packages/casan-harness/templates/plan-template.md for the execution workflow.

Summary

[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]

Technical Context

Language/Version: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Primary Dependencies: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Storage: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
Testing: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Target Platform: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION] Project Type: [e.g., library/cli/web-service/mobile-app/compiler/desktop-app or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Performance Goals: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Constraints: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Scale/Scope: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]

Constitution Check

GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.

  • Requirement-first scope is preserved: the plan resolves implementation only for behavior already justified by the spec.
  • All unresolved business rules from spec.md are either clarified or explicitly carried as constraints; none are silently assumed.
  • Strict TDD is enforceable: for every story, the plan identifies the tests that will be written first before implementation begins.
  • Stories remain independently testable and traceable to user roles, business workflow steps, and acceptance scenarios.
  • Technical decisions included here are limited to mandated constraints or decisions necessary to implement approved behavior.

Project Structure

Documentation (this feature)

specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md              # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md          # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md        # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/           # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md             # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)

Source Code (repository root)

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/

tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
└── unit/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│   ├── models/
│   ├── services/
│   └── api/
└── tests/

frontend/
├── src/
│   ├── components/
│   ├── pages/
│   └── services/
└── tests/

# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]

ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]

Structure Decision: [Document the selected structure and reference the real directories captured above]

Complexity Tracking

Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified

Violation Why Needed Simpler Alternative Rejected Because
[e.g., 4th project] [current need] [why 3 projects insufficient]
[e.g., Repository pattern] [specific problem] [why direct DB access insufficient]