feat(h5): approval-identity MVP — signed reviewer approvals (C4/V20)

Under CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT=1, a high-risk approval is trusted ONLY when a
REGISTERED reviewer cryptographically signs THIS exact request and their role is
authorized for the action — a plain env-var CASAN_APPROVER is no longer enough.

- approval-sign.sh: reviewer signs assertion
  "casan-approval|v1|<action>|<actor>|<input_sha256>|<approver_id>" with their key.
- approval-verify.sh: gate looks up reviewer role+pubkey in reviewers.registry,
  enforces role→action authorization, verifies the RSA signature (fail-closed).
- governance-check.sh: strict branch requires a valid signed approval; SoD still
  enforced; default (non-strict) env-var path UNCHANGED (baseline preserved).
- reviewers.registry: role-scoped reviewer identity registry (pubkeys off-repo;
  production replaces with OIDC/JWT from a real IdP).
- phase-h5-approval-tests.sh: 8 checks — valid/authorized approve; unsigned,
  wrong-role, forged-key, unregistered, replay-to-other-request, self-approval
  all denied; non-strict backward-compat.

Baselines: run-casan4 35/35, adversarial 44/44. Lifts H5 policy-approval (C4)
2.5 -> ~3.5-4 / 5. Total suites now 6 (+8 checks = 148).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
thanhnv
2026-07-04 23:07:16 +09:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent d8583fdb2e
commit e21a1472b1
5 changed files with 268 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# CASAN H5 — Reviewer identity registry (Approval-identity MVP · C4).
#
# Binds an approver id to a ROLE and a PUBLIC key. Under CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT=1,
# governance-check.sh trusts an approval ONLY if it is signed by the private key
# matching one of these public keys, and the reviewer's role is authorized for
# the action (see the `action` lines).
#
# Line format (no yaml dependency):
# reviewer <id> <role> <pubkey-file> # pubkey-file relative to reviewers/ dir
# action <action-name|default> <comma,roles>
#
# Reviewer PRIVATE keys live OFF-REPO (with the reviewer / issued by an IdP) —
# only PUBLIC keys are provisioned here, same policy as the audit signing key.
# Production: replace this static registry + local pubkeys with OIDC/JWT identity
# from a real IdP (verify token signature + role/exp claims).
reviewer security-lead security security-lead.pub.pem
reviewer tech-lead tech_lead tech-lead.pub.pem
reviewer ops-owner ops ops-owner.pub.pem
reviewer project-owner project_owner project-owner.pub.pem
# Which role may approve which action class.
action deploy ops,security
action migration tech_lead,security
action db_write tech_lead,security
action write_code tech_lead,security
action policy_change security
action default tech_lead,ops,security,project_owner
+39
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -uo pipefail
# CASAN H5 — Reviewer-side approval signer (Approval-identity MVP · C4 / V20).
#
# A reviewer runs this to APPROVE a specific high-risk request by signing the
# canonical assertion with THEIR OWN private key. The resulting signature is
# handed to governance-check.sh via CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG (with CASAN_APPROVER=<id>
# and CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT=1). The private key stays with the reviewer / in an
# IdP-issued credential — never in the pipeline env.
#
# Assertion (must match approval-verify.sh):
# casan-approval|v1|<action>|<actor>|<input_sha256>|<approver_id>
#
# Usage:
# approval-sign.sh <action> <actor> <input-file> <approver-id> <privkey> <out-sig>
# Exit: 0 signed, 64 usage, 1 sign error.
ACTION="${1:-}"; ACTOR="${2:-}"; INPUT_FILE="${3:-}"; APPROVER="${4:-}"; PRIV="${5:-}"; OUT="${6:-}"
if [[ -z "$ACTION" || -z "$ACTOR" || -z "$INPUT_FILE" || -z "$APPROVER" || -z "$PRIV" || -z "$OUT" ]]; then
echo "Usage: approval-sign.sh <action> <actor> <input-file> <approver-id> <privkey> <out-sig>" >&2
exit 64
fi
[[ -f "$INPUT_FILE" ]] || { echo "approval-sign: input file not found: $INPUT_FILE" >&2; exit 1; }
[[ -f "$PRIV" ]] || { echo "approval-sign: private key not found: $PRIV" >&2; exit 1; }
command -v openssl >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "approval-sign: openssl required" >&2; exit 1; }
hash_file() {
if command -v sha256sum >/dev/null 2>&1; then sha256sum "$1" | awk '{print $1}'
else shasum -a 256 "$1" | awk '{print $1}'; fi
}
INPUT_SHA="$(hash_file "$INPUT_FILE")"
MSG="casan-approval|v1|$ACTION|$ACTOR|$INPUT_SHA|$APPROVER"
TMP="$(mktemp)"; trap 'rm -f "$TMP"' EXIT
printf '%s' "$MSG" > "$TMP"
openssl dgst -sha256 -sign "$PRIV" -out "$OUT" "$TMP" \
|| { echo "approval-sign: signing failed" >&2; exit 1; }
echo "APPROVAL_SIGNED approver=$APPROVER action=$ACTION sig=$OUT"
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -uo pipefail
# CASAN H5 — Signed-approval verifier (Approval-identity MVP · C4 / V20).
#
# Problem: high-risk approval used to trust a plain env var (CASAN_APPROVER=bob) —
# anyone who can set the env can "approve". This binds an approval to a REGISTERED
# reviewer's cryptographic identity: the reviewer must SIGN this exact request with
# their private key, AND their role must be authorized for the action class.
#
# The signed assertion is: casan-approval|v1|<action>|<actor>|<input_sha256>|<approver_id>
# — so a signature for one request/reviewer cannot be replayed for another.
#
# Usage:
# approval-verify.sh <action> <actor> <input-file> <approver-id> <sig-file>
# Registry (line format, no yaml dep):
# reviewer <id> <role> <pubkey-file>
# action <action-name|default> <comma,roles>
# Env: CASAN_REVIEWERS_FILE (default governance/reviewers.registry)
# CASAN_REVIEWERS_DIR (default governance/reviewers) — base dir for pubkey-file
# Exit: 0 ok (prints "APPROVAL_OK role=<role>"), 3 deny (reason on stderr), 64 usage.
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
PROJECT_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../../.." && pwd)"
GOV_DIR="$PROJECT_ROOT/.specify/level5/central-governance"
REVIEWERS_FILE="${CASAN_REVIEWERS_FILE:-$GOV_DIR/reviewers.registry}"
REVIEWERS_DIR="${CASAN_REVIEWERS_DIR:-$GOV_DIR/reviewers}"
ACTION="${1:-}"; ACTOR="${2:-}"; INPUT_FILE="${3:-}"; APPROVER="${4:-}"; SIG_FILE="${5:-}"
if [[ -z "$ACTION" || -z "$ACTOR" || -z "$INPUT_FILE" || -z "$APPROVER" || -z "$SIG_FILE" ]]; then
echo "Usage: approval-verify.sh <action> <actor> <input-file> <approver-id> <sig-file>" >&2
exit 64
fi
deny() { echo "APPROVAL_DENIED reason=$1 approver=$APPROVER action=$ACTION" >&2; exit 3; }
[[ -f "$INPUT_FILE" ]] || deny "input_file_missing"
[[ -f "$SIG_FILE" ]] || deny "signature_missing"
[[ -f "$REVIEWERS_FILE" ]] || deny "reviewer_registry_missing"
command -v openssl >/dev/null 2>&1 || deny "openssl_unavailable"
hash_file() {
if command -v sha256sum >/dev/null 2>&1; then sha256sum "$1" | awk '{print $1}'
else shasum -a 256 "$1" | awk '{print $1}'; fi
}
# Reviewer lookup (first matching registered reviewer).
REV_LINE="$(awk -v id="$APPROVER" '$1=="reviewer" && $2==id {print $3" "$4; exit}' "$REVIEWERS_FILE")"
[[ -n "$REV_LINE" ]] || deny "approver_not_registered"
ROLE="${REV_LINE%% *}"
PUB_REL="${REV_LINE##* }"
# Role authorization for this action (fallback to the "default" action policy).
ROLES="$(awk -v a="$ACTION" '$1=="action" && $2==a {print $3; exit}' "$REVIEWERS_FILE")"
[[ -n "$ROLES" ]] || ROLES="$(awk '$1=="action" && $2=="default" {print $3; exit}' "$REVIEWERS_FILE")"
case ",$ROLES," in
*",$ROLE,"*) : ;;
*) deny "approver_role_not_authorized(role=$ROLE action=$ACTION allowed=$ROLES)" ;;
esac
# Resolve pubkey path (absolute or relative to reviewers dir).
PUB="$PUB_REL"; [[ "$PUB" = /* ]] || PUB="$REVIEWERS_DIR/$PUB_REL"
[[ -f "$PUB" ]] || deny "approver_pubkey_missing($PUB)"
# Rebuild the exact signed assertion and verify.
INPUT_SHA="$(hash_file "$INPUT_FILE")"
MSG="casan-approval|v1|$ACTION|$ACTOR|$INPUT_SHA|$APPROVER"
TMP="$(mktemp)"; trap 'rm -f "$TMP"' EXIT
printf '%s' "$MSG" > "$TMP"
openssl dgst -sha256 -verify "$PUB" -signature "$SIG_FILE" "$TMP" >/dev/null 2>&1 \
|| deny "approval_signature_invalid"
echo "APPROVAL_OK role=$ROLE approver=$APPROVER action=$ACTION"
exit 0
@@ -88,7 +88,34 @@ if [[ "$RISK_LEVEL" == "medium" ]]; then
fi
if [[ "$RISK_LEVEL" == "high" ]]; then
if [[ "$APPROVAL_DECISION" == "approve" && -n "$APPROVER" ]]; then
if [[ "${CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT:-0}" == "1" ]]; then
# Approval-identity mode (V20): an env-var approver is NOT enough — the
# reviewer must cryptographically SIGN this exact request and their role must
# be authorized for the action. SoD (actor != approver) still enforced.
if [[ "$APPROVAL_DECISION" == "approve" && -n "$APPROVER" && -n "${CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG:-}" ]]; then
if [[ "$APPROVER" == "$ACTOR" ]]; then
APPROVAL_STATUS="separation_of_duties_violation"
DECISION="denied"
REASONS+=("separation-of-duties:actor-equals-approver")
else
AV_RC=0
AV_OUT="$(bash "$SCRIPT_DIR/approval-verify.sh" "$ACTION_NAME" "$ACTOR" "$INPUT_FILE" "$APPROVER" "$CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG" 2>/dev/null)" || AV_RC=$?
if [[ "$AV_RC" -eq 0 ]]; then
APPROVAL_STATUS="human_approved_signed"
DECISION="approved"
REASONS+=("signed-approval:${AV_OUT#APPROVAL_OK }")
else
APPROVAL_STATUS="approval_signature_invalid"
DECISION="denied"
REASONS+=("signed-approval-failed")
fi
fi
else
APPROVAL_STATUS="approval_required_signed"
DECISION="denied"
REASONS+=("strict-requires-signed-approval")
fi
elif [[ "$APPROVAL_DECISION" == "approve" && -n "$APPROVER" ]]; then
if [[ "$APPROVER" == "$ACTOR" ]]; then
# Separation of duties: the submitter may not approve their own action.
APPROVAL_STATUS="separation_of_duties_violation"
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -uo pipefail
# CASAN H5 — Approval-identity MVP tests (C4 / V20).
#
# Proves that under CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT=1 a high-risk approval is trusted ONLY
# when a REGISTERED reviewer cryptographically signs THIS request and their role
# is authorized — a plain env-var approver is no longer enough. Also proves the
# default (non-strict) path is unchanged (backward compatible).
#
# Self-contained: generates ephemeral reviewer keypairs into a temp reviewers
# dir and uses the committed reviewers.registry (pubkey filenames match).
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
PROJECT_ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/../.." && pwd)"
S="$PROJECT_ROOT/.specify/scripts/bash"
REG="$PROJECT_ROOT/.specify/level5/central-governance/reviewers.registry"
WORK="$(mktemp -d)"; RV="$WORK/reviewers"; mkdir -p "$RV"
trap 'rm -rf "$WORK"' EXIT
PASS=0; FAIL=0
pass() { echo "PASS: $1"; PASS=$((PASS + 1)); }
fail() { echo "FAIL: $1"; FAIL=$((FAIL + 1)); }
expect_rc() {
local want="$1" desc="$2"; shift 2
local got=0
{ "$@" >/dev/null 2>&1; } || got=$?
[[ "$got" -eq "$want" ]] && pass "$desc (rc=$got)" || fail "$desc (got rc=$got, want $want)"
}
# Ephemeral reviewer keypairs (filenames match reviewers.registry).
for r in ops-owner tech-lead security-lead; do
openssl genrsa -out "$WORK/$r.priv.pem" 2048 2>/dev/null
openssl rsa -in "$WORK/$r.priv.pem" -pubout -out "$RV/$r.pub.pem" 2>/dev/null
done
openssl genrsa -out "$WORK/attacker.priv.pem" 2048 2>/dev/null
REQ="$WORK/req.txt"
printf 'deploy to production and run database migration\n' > "$REQ"
OTHER="$WORK/other.txt"
printf 'deploy a different unrelated change to production\n' > "$OTHER"
sign() { bash "$S/approval-sign.sh" "$@" >/dev/null 2>&1; }
# gc <extra-env...> — run governance-check in STRICT mode for a high-risk deploy
gc() {
env CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT=1 CASAN_REVIEWERS_FILE="$REG" CASAN_REVIEWERS_DIR="$RV" \
CASAN_ACTOR=alice CASAN_APPROVAL_DECISION=approve "$@" \
bash "$S/governance-check.sh" "$REQ" "$WORK/out.txt" deploy
}
echo "===== H5 approval-identity (CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT=1) ====="
# 1. Valid signed approval by an authorized role -> APPROVED
sign deploy alice "$REQ" ops-owner "$WORK/ops-owner.priv.pem" "$WORK/ops.sig"
OUT="$(gc CASAN_APPROVER=ops-owner CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG="$WORK/ops.sig" 2>/dev/null)"; RC=$?
{ [[ "$RC" -eq 0 ]] && printf '%s' "$OUT" | grep -q "human_approved_signed"; } \
&& pass "valid signed approval by authorized reviewer -> APPROVED" \
|| fail "valid signed approval rejected (rc=$RC out=$OUT)"
# 2. Env-var approver but NO signature -> DENY (the core fix)
expect_rc 2 "env-var approver without signature is denied" \
gc CASAN_APPROVER=ops-owner
# 3. Registered reviewer, but role not authorized for this action -> DENY
sign deploy alice "$REQ" tech-lead "$WORK/tech-lead.priv.pem" "$WORK/tech.sig"
expect_rc 2 "reviewer whose role is not authorized for deploy is denied" \
gc CASAN_APPROVER=tech-lead CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG="$WORK/tech.sig"
# 4. Forged signature (attacker key, claims to be ops-owner) -> DENY
sign deploy alice "$REQ" ops-owner "$WORK/attacker.priv.pem" "$WORK/forged.sig"
expect_rc 2 "forged signature (unregistered key) is denied" \
gc CASAN_APPROVER=ops-owner CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG="$WORK/forged.sig"
# 5. Unregistered approver id -> DENY
sign deploy alice "$REQ" ghost "$WORK/attacker.priv.pem" "$WORK/ghost.sig"
expect_rc 2 "unregistered approver id is denied" \
gc CASAN_APPROVER=ghost CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG="$WORK/ghost.sig"
# 6. Replay: a signature bound to a DIFFERENT request cannot approve this one
sign deploy alice "$OTHER" ops-owner "$WORK/ops-owner.priv.pem" "$WORK/replay.sig"
expect_rc 2 "signature bound to another request cannot be replayed" \
gc CASAN_APPROVER=ops-owner CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG="$WORK/replay.sig"
# 7. Separation of duties still enforced even with a valid signature
sign deploy ops-owner "$REQ" ops-owner "$WORK/ops-owner.priv.pem" "$WORK/sod.sig"
expect_rc 2 "self-approval denied even with a valid signature (SoD)" \
env CASAN_APPROVAL_STRICT=1 CASAN_REVIEWERS_FILE="$REG" CASAN_REVIEWERS_DIR="$RV" \
CASAN_ACTOR=ops-owner CASAN_APPROVAL_DECISION=approve \
CASAN_APPROVER=ops-owner CASAN_APPROVAL_SIG="$WORK/sod.sig" \
bash "$S/governance-check.sh" "$REQ" "$WORK/out.txt" deploy
# 8. Backward compatibility: default (non-strict) env approval still works
expect_rc 0 "non-strict env approval unchanged (backward compatible)" \
env CASAN_ACTOR=alice CASAN_APPROVAL_DECISION=approve CASAN_APPROVER=bob \
bash "$S/governance-check.sh" "$REQ" "$WORK/out.txt" deploy
echo ""
echo "===== H5 APPROVAL-IDENTITY SUMMARY: PASS=$PASS FAIL=$FAIL ====="
[[ "$FAIL" -eq 0 ]] || exit 1