Files
cowork-local/application/model_routing/routing_models.py
T
anhtnm1andClaude Opus 5 f61c5474b0 feat(R03): unify model routing and centralise the provider catalogue
EPIC R03 (Team Duy) — Model Providers & Routing. All six tasks done.

R03-T02 — Provider catalogue
  domain/models/provider_descriptor.py     ProviderDescriptor (frozen), WireProtocol, AuthKind
  infrastructure/providers/provider_registry.py
                                           thread-safe registry: id/alias lookup, dynamic
                                           lookup by model id, adapter selection by protocol
  providers/factory.py                     drops its own _REGISTRY table and delegates to the
                                           registry, still raising ProviderError for callers

R03-T03 — RoutingApplicationService (pure Python, 4 modes)
  application/model_routing/routing_models.py
                                           RoutingMode (off/auto/manual/fallback),
                                           RoutingRequest (immutable snapshot), RouteEvaluation,
                                           RoutingOutcome
  application/model_routing/routing_application_service.py
                                           the single decision flow, reached through two narrow
                                           ports plus a caller-supplied confirm callback, so no
                                           Qt import is needed
  application/model_routing/core_routing_adapter.py
                                           binds the ports to core/routing and AppContext

  Fallback is a new resilience mode: keep the selected model while it can serve the turn,
  re-route only when it cannot. Wired end to end through config.py, state.py,
  ui/routing_toggle.py and i18n.py (EN/JA/VI).

R03-T04 / T05 — Remove the duplicated routing flow
  ui/chat_panel.py (#L638), ui/co4e_tab.py, ui/folder_tab.py each drop ~35 lines of copied
  logic and call the shared service; the widgets now only build a RoutingRequest, host the
  Manual-mode modal and render the outcome.

R03-T06 — Token usage as an event
  infrastructure/telemetry/usage_sink.py   UsageEvent + UsageEventSink protocol, with tracker,
                                           in-memory and composite sinks
  providers/openai_compat.py, providers/anthropic.py
                                           publish a UsageEvent instead of writing to the
                                           usage tracker themselves
  core/usage_tracker.py                    adds current_context() so a sink can borrow and
                                           restore a thread's attribution

R03-T01 — Contract tests
  tests/contracts/test_providers.py parametrises over every provider in the registry: chat()
  signature, canonical assistant message, normalised tool calls, response closed, tool schema
  translation, ProviderError, list_models/test_connection, one UsageEvent per turn.

Test infrastructure fix (required to verify any of the above): tests/conftest.py used to put
the repository's PARENT directory on sys.path, so `import cowork_local.*` resolved against
whichever sibling folder happened to carry that name — on a dev machine, an unrelated older
checkout. The suite reported green while exercising different code. The conftest now binds
this checkout to the cowork_local name in sys.modules.

Verification
  pytest tests/                    236 passed in ~1.8s (102 before this change)
  scripts/check_imports.py         PASS, 0 forbidden imports in domain/ and application/
  new production files             largest is 288 lines, all under the 400 LOC ceiling
  new tests                        134 (50 contract, 70 unit, 14 integration), all offline

scripts/run_quality_gate.py does not exist yet (R10-T02), so DoD item 7 was covered by
check_imports.py plus the full suite.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 19:36:20 +09:00

159 lines
6.3 KiB
Python

"""Pure-Python DTOs exchanged with :mod:`routing_application_service`.
These types are the vocabulary the chat surfaces (Cowork chat, Co4E, AI-Edit)
now speak instead of each re-deriving routing state from raw config lookups and
``core/routing`` internals.
Layer rules (``docs/architecture/ADR-001-layered-architecture.md``): application
code is 100% pure Python. Nothing here imports PySide6, and nothing here imports
``core.routing`` either — the concrete routing engine is reached only through
the adapter in :mod:`core_routing_adapter`, which keeps this module trivially
testable with plain fakes.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import Any, Optional, Tuple
class RoutingMode(str, Enum):
"""The four routing behaviours a surface can be in (R03-T03).
``OFF``/``AUTO``/``MANUAL`` map 1:1 onto the existing per-surface toggle and
onto ``core/routing/models.py::SwitchMode``. ``FALLBACK`` is new and
deliberately NOT an optimisation mode: it keeps whatever model the user
chose and only re-routes when that model cannot serve the turn, which is the
behaviour a resilience-minded workspace wants (never surprise me, but never
leave me stuck either).
"""
OFF = "off"
AUTO = "auto"
MANUAL = "manual"
FALLBACK = "fallback"
@classmethod
def parse(cls, raw: Any, default: "RoutingMode" = None) -> "RoutingMode":
"""Best-effort coercion from config/UI strings.
Routing must never break a turn, so an unrecognised value degrades to
``default`` (``OFF`` unless told otherwise) instead of raising — the same
defensive posture ``config.routing_mode_for`` already takes.
"""
fallback = default if default is not None else cls.OFF
if isinstance(raw, cls):
return raw
try:
return cls(str(raw or "").strip().lower())
except ValueError:
return fallback
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class RoutingRequest:
"""Everything needed to decide how ONE turn should be routed.
Frozen: the request is captured from live UI state (the selected model, the
typed prompt) and then handed to code that may run on a worker thread. An
immutable snapshot means the user changing the model picker mid-turn cannot
retroactively alter the decision that was already made — the same rationale
behind R04's ``ConversationExecutionRequest``.
"""
surface: str # "cowork" | "co4e" | "ai_edit" | ...
prompt: str # the user's text; drives task classification
current_provider: str # provider the surface would use as-is
current_model: str = "" # model the surface would use ("" = provider default)
mode: Optional[RoutingMode] = None # explicit override; None -> resolve per surface
# Pre-classified task type ("coding", "qa", ...). AI-Edit always knows its
# turns are coding work, so it pins this and skips prompt classification.
task_type: Optional[str] = None
required_capabilities: Tuple[str, ...] = () # e.g. ("vision",)
@property
def has_prompt(self) -> bool:
"""Whether there is anything to classify. An empty prompt cannot be
routed meaningfully, so every surface short-circuits on it."""
return bool((self.prompt or "").strip())
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class RouteEvaluation:
"""A routing engine's verdict, normalised away from ``core/routing`` types.
The adapter flattens ``RouteResult``/``SwitchDecision`` into these plain
fields so the application service never touches Pydantic models or enums
owned by another layer. ``decision`` still carries the original object
because the Manual-mode confirm dialog renders its ``reason``.
"""
task_type: str
should_switch: bool
target_provider: Optional[str] = None
target_model: Optional[str] = None
score_gain: float = 0.0
reason: str = ""
# False when the currently selected model is not a usable candidate for this
# task (unranked, unavailable, or failed its last probe) — the single signal
# FALLBACK mode acts on.
current_is_usable: bool = True
decision: Any = None # original SwitchDecision, for the UI dialog
@property
def has_target(self) -> bool:
"""A switch is only actionable when the engine named a model to move to."""
return bool(self.target_model or self.target_provider)
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class RoutingOutcome:
"""What the calling surface should actually do for this turn.
A surface needs exactly three things from routing — "which provider/model do
I build?", "do I tell the user?" and "was I told to stand down?" — so those
are the fields here, and nothing else. ``provider``/``model`` are ``None``
when the surface should keep its own selection untouched.
"""
mode: RoutingMode
switched: bool = False
provider: Optional[str] = None
model: Optional[str] = None
task_type: str = ""
score_gain: float = 0.0
reason: str = ""
# True when Manual mode proposed a switch and the user declined or the
# confirmation timed out. Distinct from "no switch proposed" so a surface
# can tell "routing had nothing to offer" from "the user said no".
declined: bool = False
decision: Any = field(default=None, repr=False)
@property
def should_notify(self) -> bool:
"""Whether the surface should post the "switched model" status bubble.
Only an executed switch is worth interrupting the transcript for."""
return self.switched
@classmethod
def keep_current(
cls,
mode: RoutingMode,
*,
reason: str = "",
task_type: str = "",
declined: bool = False,
decision: Any = None,
) -> "RoutingOutcome":
"""The no-change outcome — the single constructor for every path that
leaves the surface's own model selection in place (routing off, empty
prompt, no better candidate, user declined, internal error)."""
return cls(
mode=mode, switched=False, provider=None, model=None,
task_type=task_type, reason=reason, declined=declined, decision=decision,
)
__all__ = ["RoutingMode", "RoutingRequest", "RouteEvaluation", "RoutingOutcome"]