Nam Pham Dinh ThanhandClaude Opus 5
e5bd6791e7
Section 16 of the audit page draws the three actions on the title row, a magnifier inside the search box, caps section headings, and names its complaint outright: "Ô icon trong lưới hiện tại không có viền/hover rõ khi rê chuột hay khi đang chọn" — you could not tell which cell you were about to pick. So: Thêm / Dán / Xoá move from the strip under both grids (where they read as belonging to the custom grid alone) up beside the title; the search box gets its magnifier; the two headings become caps through the same #navSectionHdr style the rail uses; and #iconGrid cells take an accent border on hover and on selection, the card language Agent and Công cụ already use. Wording follows the drawing too: "ICON TÍCH HỢP" rather than "Icon có sẵn", and "Tìm icon theo tên…" rather than "Tìm icon có sẵn…". Left alone, and worth a decision: the drawing labels the buttons "+ Thêm icon" and "Xoá", where the app says "Thêm tệp SVG" and "Xóa tùy chỉnh". The longer labels say which file type is wanted and that only custom icons can be deleted, so shortening them to match the drawing would cost more than it gains. check_icons_screen covers the four points. Its first version passed a mutation that dropped the buttons from the header layout — unparented they sit at (0,0), which read as "the same row" — so it now requires the vertical centres to line up AND each button to start right of the title. 20/20 checkers pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 lines
278 B
JSON
16 lines
278 B
JSON
{
|
|
"kind": "cowork",
|
|
"session_id": "20260818-130950-831",
|
|
"title": "alo",
|
|
"created": "2026-08-18T13:10:03",
|
|
"pinned": false,
|
|
"project_id": "project-mới",
|
|
"inputs": [],
|
|
"outputs": [],
|
|
"messages": [
|
|
{
|
|
"role": "user",
|
|
"content": "alo"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |