dc6cb309c210b28070903ddbe0c80b0cb2f2b948
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 NamPDTandClaude Opus 5
|
b6dee044c9 |
feat(ui): adapt to the screen and its scaling, not to fixed pixels
Two things differ between machines and only one of them is width: a 4K panel
has more pixels, while a 125%/150% display has the same logical pixels holding
LESS, because every label and margin is taller. Breakpoints written as raw
pixels only hold on the machine they were tuned on.
* ui_scale() derives a factor from font height (1.0 at the 15px line the
layouts were measured against) and every narrow-guard threshold is
multiplied by it, so panes fold when the content is cramped rather than
when a number is crossed.
* The window takes a share of the available screen (80% × 85%) with the old
1180×760 as the floor, instead of opening at that size on any monitor.
* Moving the window to another screen re-pins the assistant and re-decides
the fold, since the new screen's work area and scaling may differ.
Found by tools/check_multi_screen.py, which walks 5 window sizes × 3 font
scales:
* At 150%, Schedule was clipped on 1280 and 1366 screens and the window's
own minimum grew to 1459px — wider than a 1280 laptop, so the app could
not fit at all. The cause was not the lanes: the one-line lane-count
summary in the header reported a sizeHint wide enough to set the minimum
width of the entire window. It now yields first (its text stays in the
tooltip); the window minimum drops 1459 → 752 and holds there at every
scale.
Also: these checkers exited 0xC0000409 from a Qt teardown crash AFTER printing
their verdict. check_probes_bite decides whether a probe caught its mutation by
reading exit codes, so a crash would have counted as "caught" — the round could
have passed while proving nothing. They now flush and os._exit with the real
verdict, and round 5 still catches all six mutations.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
NamPDTandClaude Opus 5
|
f381fd298a |
test(ui): five verification rounds, and two things they found
Five rounds, each looking from an angle the previous one cannot:
1. text — every "Thay đổi" bullet on the page vs a probe (existing)
2. geometry — check_layout_geometry.py: reading order of the rail, section
order down Monitoring, which side each pane is on, and the size
relationships the design names (hero card, 26px dot)
3. inventory— check_controls_alive.py: every control in controls.json still
present in the built app, attributed to its owning CLASS via the
baseline commit (a file holds several classes, so a per-file
check reported eight dialog controls as missing)
4. eyes — rendered screens read against the wireframes
5. adversarial — check_probes_bite.py: break one feature at a time and fail if
the matching check still passes
What rounds 4 and 5 caught, which 1-3 could not:
* Schedule showed six of seven lanes; the seventh needed a horizontal
scroll. The design says "giữ đủ 7 lane, thu hẹp cho vừa một màn". Lane
minimum width 190 → 150, so 7 × 150 + gaps fits a 1280 window. Round 2 now
measures this instead of relying on someone noticing.
* check_design_parity ALWAYS returned 0. It was a report, not a check: every
probe in it was incapable of failing, so a regression would print on screen
and still exit green. It now exits non-zero when anything is CHUA — which
is what let round 5 detect the two mutations it had been sleeping through.
Also fixed in the harness itself: it rewrote line endings while restoring
mutated files (read_text/write_text translate both ways), and it compared the
tree against "clean" rather than against its own starting state.
All ten checkers green by exit code.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
NamPDTandClaude Opus 5
|
62bec1f984 |
fix(ui): sections 17 and 18 were checked against the wrong text
check_design_parity read its checklist from build_audit_page.ANALYSIS. Eight
sections of the audit page are hand-written, and for those the generator's
text is NOT what the page says — so Settings and the Task editor were reported
as matching a design they had never been compared against. The Task editor was
in fact built backwards.
* The checker now reads the "Thay đổi" bullets straight out of
docs/ui-audit.html, and reports how many bullets on the page still have no
probe (57 on the page, 32 probed) instead of implying full coverage.
* Task editor: reverted from three step tabs to a left list + right panel,
five rows matching the five real group boxes — which is what the page asks
for, in as many words ("thay vì chia tab"), for consistency with Settings.
* Settings now switches panels rather than scrolling, so both dialogs are
navigated identically and neither is a long scroll any more.
* Settings field presentation, as the page's second bullet asks: the six
checkboxes became switches, and Language/Theme became segmented controls.
ToggleSwitch subclasses QCheckBox and SegmentedControl exposes the slice
of the QComboBox API this dialog uses, so no save/load path changed —
verified by round-tripping language/theme/tray through _save().
All 22 task-editor fields and 14 settings fields verified present after the
move; 7 suites green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
NamPDTandClaude Opus 5
|
cb68f87b35 |
feat(ui): close the last gaps against the audit design (31/31)
check_design_parity.py reads its checklist from the audit page's own
proposals; it now reports every one of the 31 as implemented, with no
deliberate divergences left.
* Schedule: the Kanban/Calendar drop-list became a pair of tabs, and the
Running lane is outlined while it holds anything — dropping a card there
starts the task for real, so it should not look like the other six.
* Cowork: agent / routing / usage / folder moved out of the typing box into
their own status strip beneath it, styled as status rather than a second
toolbar. All of them stay interactive; the design's read-only strip would
have cost features.
* Folder: the path is written as the screen's title instead of sitting in a
read-only text box that looked editable and cost a row.
* GraphRAG: the second toolbar row is gone (Export joined the first), and
the one button that relabelled itself became Đồ thị | Tin nhắn tabs, so
the view you are NOT in is named too.
* Settings gained the theme picker, so language / provider / theme are all
reachable there as well as on the rail's account row.
* Task editor: the five group boxes are grouped into three step tabs
(Nội dung → Lịch chạy → Liên kết). All 22 fields verified present after
the move; only the old section index is gone, replaced by the tabs.
* The assistant dot now clears a screen's own bottom bar (Cowork's
composer), measured from the composer's top edge in window coordinates.
Also adds .gitattributes: without it a Windows checkout records CRLF and
every file reads as fully rewritten to a Linux CI runner.
Verification: 7 check_*.py suites green, no screen clipped at 1920/1366/1280,
and no dialog scrolls sideways at 9/11/14pt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
NamPDTandClaude Opus 5
|
0fa61b6a95 |
feat(ui): flat nav rail, compact assistant, responsive layouts
Implements the redesign from docs/ui-audit.html. Rearrangement only — no
feature was removed; every control that moved kept its handler, and the
gates that used to hide things now grey them out instead.
Navigation
* The rail is one flat list: the five Workspace sub-views sit at the top
level instead of behind an accordion, with Dashboard/Monitoring pinned
at the foot and Settings below them.
* Cowork and GraphRAG stay listed and greyed while no project is
selected, rather than vanishing and resizing the menu under the user.
* Monitoring keeps its eight sub-views in its own tab strip (unhidden)
instead of doubling the rail's length.
* _goto now moves the highlight itself, fixing a long-standing bug where
programmatic navigation left the rail pointing at the previous screen.
* Rail header gained the project picker and "New chat"; RECENTS lists the
active project's threads. Both are second views of existing state — the
Cowork toolbar button and the full History panel are untouched.
* Provider / language / theme moved from the top bar to an account row at
the foot of the rail (same widgets, same signals).
Screens
* Co4E: the flow tab strip is gone (per the design); Flow Status became a
toolbar toggle with its own way back, and the three icon-only tabs became
four labelled, foldable sections in one column. One flow open at a time
is the one capability this costs; background runs are unaffected.
* Dashboard: header split into two rows; cost promoted to a hero card.
* Monitoring Overview: one scrolling column of titled sections; the model
price table got its own full-width section instead of sharing a row with
the CPU meters.
* Settings and Task editor gained a section index down the left.
* Help dock: 84x64 launcher + chevron became one 26px dot that expands to
a labelled pill on hover; "hide to the edge" moved into the panel's menu.
Layout
* The window's minimum width dropped from 1453px to 768px. The main cause
was a QTabWidget taking its minimum from the widest page even when that
page is hidden, so Co4E was forcing Project and Cowork wide.
* Secondary panes fold themselves on a narrow window and restore when it
grows, never overriding a fold the user made.
* The long dialogs no longer scroll sideways at any font size.
Verification: tools/check_*.py build a real MainWindow offscreen against a
copy of ~/.cowork_local with the schedulers no-oped. check_design_parity.py
reads its checklist straight from the audit page's own proposals.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|