## Summary epic r04 - begin refactor ## Change Type - [x] Cowork feature - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] Core AI contribution - [ ] Test / hardening - [ ] Performance - [ ] Documentation ## Related Work Cowork Task: Core Repo: http://34.143.229.138/gitea-admin/fsg-ai-core-assets Core AI Issue: Core Task: Related PR: ## Scope What is intentionally included? What is intentionally NOT included? ## Validation - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Integration tests - [ ] Manual verification - [ ] Regression check Commands / evidence: ## Security Impact Permission / credential / network / customer data impact: ## Compatibility - [ ] No breaking change - [ ] Breaking change documented ## Reviewer Notes Anything Cowork reviewers should pay attention to. --------- Co-authored-by: Anh Tran Nguyen Minh <anhtnm1@fpt.com> Co-authored-by: Huong Le Thi Thien <huongltt35@fpt.com> Co-authored-by: Nam Pham Dinh Thanh <nampdt@fpt.com> Co-authored-by: Vu Dam Tuan <vudt15@fpt.com> Co-authored-by: Hiep Ha Van <hiephv3@fpt.com> Co-authored-by: Lam Hoang Van <lamhv7@fpt.com> Reviewed-on: #7 Co-authored-by: Duy Le Huu <duylh19@fpt.com>
This commit was merged in pull request #7.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
|
||||
"""R03-T03/T04/T05 — the unified routing path over the REAL routing engine.
|
||||
|
||||
The unit tests drive ``RoutingApplicationService`` against fakes; this suite
|
||||
proves the same service produces correct outcomes on top of the actual
|
||||
``core/routing`` stack (classifier → assessment store → scorer → selector →
|
||||
switch controller), which is what the three chat surfaces now call.
|
||||
|
||||
Offline by construction: a fake probe client answers benchmarks and judging, and
|
||||
the assessment store is a temp file — no network, no Qt, no ``$HOME`` writes.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import copy
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
from cowork_local.application.model_routing import (
|
||||
AppContextModeResolver,
|
||||
CoreRoutingEngine,
|
||||
RoutingApplicationService,
|
||||
RoutingMode,
|
||||
RoutingRequest,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from cowork_local.config import DEFAULT_CONFIG, AppConfig
|
||||
from cowork_local.core import projects as projects_mod
|
||||
from cowork_local.core.routing.clients import CompletionResult
|
||||
from cowork_local.core.routing.service import RoutingService
|
||||
from cowork_local.core.routing.store import AssessmentStore
|
||||
from cowork_local.state import AppContext
|
||||
|
||||
STRONG_ANSWER = "STRONG-DETAILED-CORRECT-ANSWER"
|
||||
WEAK_ANSWER = "weak"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class FakeProbeClient:
|
||||
"""Deterministic stand-in for the provider layer used during assessment.
|
||||
|
||||
Mirrors ``tests/routing/test_service.py``'s client: benchmark prompts get a
|
||||
per-model canned answer, and judge prompts are graded by looking up that
|
||||
answer, so scores are stable and no model is ever really called.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, answers, quality) -> None:
|
||||
self.answers = answers
|
||||
self.quality = quality
|
||||
|
||||
def complete(self, provider, model_id, messages) -> CompletionResult:
|
||||
text = messages[0]["content"]
|
||||
if "grading an AI assistant" in text: # the judge rubric prompt
|
||||
score = 0.0
|
||||
for answer, value in self.quality.items():
|
||||
if answer and answer in text:
|
||||
score = value
|
||||
break
|
||||
return CompletionResult(text='{"score": %s}' % score)
|
||||
answer = self.answers.get((provider, model_id))
|
||||
if answer is None:
|
||||
return CompletionResult(error="unavailable")
|
||||
return CompletionResult(text=answer, tokens_out=len(answer) // 4)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture()
|
||||
def ctx(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
||||
"""An AppContext with two assessable models and temp-only persistence."""
|
||||
# Keep workspace load/save off the developer's real ~/.cowork_local.
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(projects_mod, "PROJECTS_DIR", tmp_path / "projects")
|
||||
data = copy.deepcopy(DEFAULT_CONFIG)
|
||||
data["providers"] = {
|
||||
"anthropic": {"base_url": "x", "api_key": "x", "model": "strong-model"},
|
||||
}
|
||||
data["routing"]["candidates"] = [
|
||||
{"provider": "anthropic", "model_id": "strong-model", "tier": "powerful"},
|
||||
{"provider": "anthropic", "model_id": "weak-model", "tier": "fast"},
|
||||
]
|
||||
data["routing"]["judge_provider"] = "anthropic"
|
||||
data["routing"]["judge_model"] = "judge-model"
|
||||
data["routing"]["policy"] = "quality"
|
||||
data["routing"]["min_score_gain"] = 0.05
|
||||
return AppContext(AppConfig(data=data, path=tmp_path / "config.json"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture()
|
||||
def routing_service(ctx, tmp_path) -> RoutingService:
|
||||
"""A real RoutingService with a populated assessment store."""
|
||||
client = FakeProbeClient(
|
||||
answers={
|
||||
("anthropic", "strong-model"): STRONG_ANSWER,
|
||||
("anthropic", "weak-model"): WEAK_ANSWER,
|
||||
},
|
||||
quality={STRONG_ANSWER: 0.95, WEAK_ANSWER: 0.35},
|
||||
)
|
||||
store = AssessmentStore(store_path=tmp_path / "assess.json",
|
||||
history_dir=tmp_path / "history")
|
||||
service = RoutingService(ctx, store=store, client=client)
|
||||
service.reassess() # populate real probe results + fit scores
|
||||
return service
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture()
|
||||
def app_service(ctx, routing_service) -> RoutingApplicationService:
|
||||
"""The application service wired exactly the way the UI wires it."""
|
||||
return RoutingApplicationService(
|
||||
CoreRoutingEngine(routing_service),
|
||||
AppContextModeResolver(ctx),
|
||||
confirm_timeout_sec=lambda: float(ctx.config.routing["confirm_timeout_sec"]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def coding_request(**overrides) -> RoutingRequest:
|
||||
"""A coding turn currently pinned to the weaker model."""
|
||||
fields = dict(
|
||||
surface="cowork",
|
||||
prompt="Write a Python function to reverse a linked list",
|
||||
current_provider="anthropic",
|
||||
current_model="weak-model",
|
||||
)
|
||||
fields.update(overrides)
|
||||
return RoutingRequest(**fields)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
# Auto / Off / Manual over the real engine
|
||||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_auto_switches_to_the_better_assessed_model(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""The real scorer must rank the strong model first and the service must
|
||||
hand that model back as this turn's override."""
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(coding_request(mode=RoutingMode.AUTO))
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is True
|
||||
assert outcome.provider == "anthropic"
|
||||
assert outcome.model == "strong-model"
|
||||
assert outcome.task_type == "coding" # classified from the prompt
|
||||
assert outcome.score_gain > 0
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_off_keeps_the_pinned_model(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""Off must not switch even when a clearly better model is assessed."""
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(coding_request(mode=RoutingMode.OFF))
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is False
|
||||
assert outcome.provider is None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_manual_asks_before_switching(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""The confirm callback receives the engine's own decision object, which is
|
||||
what ``ui/routing_toggle.py::confirm_switch`` renders."""
|
||||
seen: list = []
|
||||
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(
|
||||
coding_request(mode=RoutingMode.MANUAL),
|
||||
confirm=lambda decision, timeout: seen.append((decision, timeout)) or True,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is True
|
||||
decision, timeout = seen[0]
|
||||
assert decision.to_model == "anthropic/strong-model"
|
||||
assert decision.reason # human-readable explanation
|
||||
assert timeout == pytest.approx(60.0) # from DEFAULT_CONFIG
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_manual_decline_keeps_the_pinned_model(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(
|
||||
coding_request(mode=RoutingMode.MANUAL),
|
||||
confirm=lambda decision, timeout: False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is False
|
||||
assert outcome.declined is True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_already_best_model_is_left_alone(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""No pointless churn: being on the best model is not a switch."""
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(
|
||||
coding_request(mode=RoutingMode.AUTO, current_model="strong-model"))
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
# Fallback over the real engine
|
||||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
def test_fallback_keeps_an_assessed_model_even_though_a_better_one_exists(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""weak-model IS usable (it has a real probe score), so Fallback stays put
|
||||
where Auto would switch — the behavioural difference between the modes."""
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(coding_request(mode=RoutingMode.FALLBACK))
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fallback_rescues_a_model_the_engine_cannot_serve(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""A model absent from the ranking (never assessed / unavailable) is exactly
|
||||
the situation Fallback exists for."""
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(
|
||||
coding_request(mode=RoutingMode.FALLBACK, current_model="ghost-model"))
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is True
|
||||
assert outcome.model == "strong-model"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
# Surface parity — the point of R03-T04/T05
|
||||
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize("surface", ["cowork", "co4e", "ai_edit"])
|
||||
def test_every_surface_gets_the_same_decision(app_service, surface) -> None:
|
||||
"""Chat, Co4E and AI-Edit used to hold three copies of this logic. Given the
|
||||
same inputs they must now be indistinguishable."""
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(coding_request(surface=surface, mode=RoutingMode.AUTO))
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is True
|
||||
assert outcome.model == "strong-model"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ai_edit_pinned_task_type_reaches_the_engine(app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""AI-Edit pins "coding" instead of classifying; the engine must honour it
|
||||
even when the instruction text reads like something else entirely."""
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(coding_request(
|
||||
surface="ai_edit",
|
||||
prompt="Write a poem about the ocean", # classifier would say "creative"
|
||||
task_type="coding",
|
||||
mode=RoutingMode.AUTO,
|
||||
))
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.task_type == "coding"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mode_comes_from_the_workspace_when_not_pinned(ctx, app_service) -> None:
|
||||
"""With no explicit mode, the service reads the per-workspace setting — the
|
||||
lookup the widgets used to do themselves."""
|
||||
ctx.config.data["routing"]["switch_mode"] = "auto"
|
||||
|
||||
outcome = app_service.resolve(coding_request())
|
||||
|
||||
assert outcome.mode is RoutingMode.AUTO
|
||||
assert outcome.switched is True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_fallback_mode_survives_a_round_trip_through_config(ctx) -> None:
|
||||
"""The new mode must be persistable, or the toggle could never select it."""
|
||||
ctx.config.set_routing_mode_for("cowork", "fallback")
|
||||
|
||||
assert ctx.config.routing_mode_for("cowork") == "fallback"
|
||||
assert ctx.project_routing_mode("cowork") == "fallback"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unknown_persisted_mode_degrades_to_off(ctx) -> None:
|
||||
"""A hand-edited config must not enable routing by accident."""
|
||||
ctx.config.routing["surface_modes"]["cowork"] = "turbo"
|
||||
|
||||
assert ctx.config.routing_mode_for("cowork") == "off"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user