Files
CASAN/00_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE

HarnessAthon Submission Package

One-Line Positioning

We upgraded the SDD Speckit OKR pipeline from the CASAN Level 3→4 transition to CASAN Level 4 — proven by attack: H4/H5/H6 (former GAPs 20/25/30) now defeat ~23 live adversarial vectors with on-screen exit codes. Level 5 is stated as roadmap (IdP, WORM log storage, provider-telemetry API, hosted dashboard) — not claimed as achieved.

Open These First

  1. presentation/HarnessAthon_CASAN_Level5_Demo.pptx
  2. docs/00_task_breakdown.md
  3. docs/01_submission_checklist.md
  4. docs/02_pitch_script.md
  5. docs/03_judge_qna.md
  6. docs/04_evidence_map.md
  7. video/01_video_recording_guide.md
  8. ai_context/AI_README.md

Main Evidence

Evidence Source
Harness test report ../AINative_OKR_CASAN5/docs/output/casan/evidence/harness-test-report.md
CASAN assessment ../AINative_OKR_CASAN5/docs/output/casan/casan-level4-assessment.md
Before/after scorecard ../AINative_OKR_CASAN5/docs/output/casan/before-after-scorecard.md
Demo pipeline context ../AINative_OKR_CASAN5/docs/output/output_logs/casan-demo/pipeline-context.yaml
Central dashboard ../AINative_OKR_CASAN5/docs/output/casan/central-agentops-dashboard.html
Final zip ../AINative_OKR_CASAN5.zip

Folder Purpose

Folder Purpose
docs/ Checklist, pitch script, judge Q&A, evidence map, AI-optimized structure notes
presentation/ PPT deck and deterministic generation source
video/ Screen-recording guide and narration outline
evidence/ Evidence index pointing to canonical generated evidence
ai_context/ One-page context for AI/teammate review

Verification Command

cd ../AINative_OKR_CASAN5
bash .specify/tests/run-casan4-harness-tests.sh

Expected: all PASS, including H4/H5/H6 and Level 5 evidence checks.

Claim Boundary

  • CASAN Level 4: achieved.
  • CASAN Level 5: demonstrated locally with signed policy, provider telemetry import, shared harness registry, fallback, drift detection, rollback, KPI feedback, and central dashboard.
  • Enterprise production Level 5 still needs live IdP, WORM storage, live provider API integration, and hosted dashboard.

Production hardening — implemented vs planned

Following Plan-07/Plan-09, the following hardening is implemented and tested (each control has an executable adversarial test that fails if the control is removed). Full status: casan-next-plans/CASAN_HARDENING_STATUS.md.

  • Implemented + tested (Plan-07 Track A): H4 strict semantic fail-closed (CASAN_SECURITY_STRICT), unicode/encoding normalization (homoglyph, zero-width, fullwidth, base64/hex), tool-output injection scan, H5 telemetry-integrity signing, H6 absolute + cumulative + cold-start cost controls, benign/false-positive budget gate (FP ≤ 3%, adversarial block ≥ 95%, CRITICAL = 100%).
  • Implemented + tested (Plan-07 Track C-MVP): tool-authorization / action gating, supply-chain gate, data-exfiltration guard.
  • Scaffold + tested (Track C-MVP): runtime sandbox — static policy + ulimit backstops. Not kernel isolation; production needs container --network=none --read-only --pids-limit / nsjail.
  • Implemented + tested (Plan-09 MVP): Evidence Pack — casan pack / casan verify-pack (tamper-evident manifest + signed head + certified-run gate).
  • Implemented + tested (H5 governance hardening): approval-identity (reviewer cryptographically signs the request + role authorization — env-var approver no longer enough); KMS key management (Vault Transit sign + rotation + non-exportable, validated live); external WORM audit ledger (rollback + tamper detection).
  • Implemented + tested (H6 AgentOps hardening): live alert dispatch (webhook + dedup + dead-letter, fail-loud, end-to-end from a failing step); provider-telemetry API fetch + local-vs-provider reconciliation (catches token under-reporting); hosted dashboard with stale-aware /healthz; sliding-window circuit breaker (V15).
  • Implemented + tested (deep-gap closers, post-competition): incident response
    • scoped kill-switch (C7, severity→auto-stop); multilingual VI/JA injection detection (0 FP on benign VI/JA); TRUE container runtime isolation (C6, kernel neutralises egress/host-read, validated live via Docker); split-injection (assembled-context scan) + classifier-injection resistance.
  • Planned (NOT done — do not claim as production-ready): HSM + KMS-by-default, live IdP (OIDC/JWT), true WORM store (S3 Object Lock), deployed dashboard host + managed alert channel, real billing-API telemetry, model-digest pinning.

Test totals: baseline 79 (run-casan4 35 + adversarial 44) preserved, +132 new hardening checks (Track A 25, Track C-MVP 29, Evidence Pack 7, H5-approval 8, H5-infra KMS+WORM 7, H6-agentops 20, C7-incident 15, H4-multilingual 7, C6-sandbox 6, H4-split-inject 8) = 211, 0 fail — last full run 2026-07-05 (KMS + container isolation validated live via Vault + Docker; evidence/scoring-run-report.md). Fair maturity: H4 rose to 83 and H2 to 82 (deep-gap closers); H5/H6 stay at 80 (remaining gaps are infra) so the lowest harness is still 80 — CASAN Level 4, proven by attack. See CASAN_HARDENING_STATUS.md. Because these live in separate suites, the demo attack battery counts in video/01_video_recording_guide.md are unchanged.