Organize CASAN as a reusable source hub with SPLIT releases so downstream adopts only the level it needs (packaging/levels.json is the single source of truth). Implemented now: - Level 1 Core: bin/casan CLI (run/gate/test/verify/reuse/dashboard) + VERSION. - Level 2 DevKit: packages/casan-devkit (install.sh, Dockerfile.harness, templates: project scaffold, domain-pack, gitea-workflow). - scripts/package-release.sh core|devkit|platform|all-in-one-demo — builds split bundles into dist/ (BUNDLE-MANIFEST + SHA256SUMS); platform is stamped PREVIEW/INCOMPLETE; enterprise (future) is REFUSED (exit 3, no fake-complete package). Bundles verified: extract → bin/casan works, deterministic + domain suites pass, casan reuse VALID. - docs/packaging: CASAN_PACKAGING_PLAN + ADOPTION + CI + DOMAIN_PACK + GITEA_PACKAGE + DOCKER. Structure + docs only: - Level 3 packages/casan-platform (dashboard exists; control-panel/viewers pending). - Level 4 packages/casan-enterprise (RBAC/tenant/KMS/WORM/approval exist in core; governed console pending). No Chat Console/RBAC-console/tenant-console/model-mgmt built in this task. Harness change (enables extracted bundles to self-resolve): casan-paths.sh + the Python project_root() walk-ups now accept a second root marker `packages/casan-harness` in addition to `.specify`, so a freshly-unpacked core/devkit/demo bundle (no `.specify` yet) roots correctly and creates state on first run. In an adopted repo `.specify` still matches first. policy-bundle.yaml paths corrected to packages/casan-harness (re-signed). Full gate 64/0/3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.7 KiB
CASAN Domain Pack Guide
A Domain Pack is the per-project data the harness needs to govern YOUR domain. It lives
at apps/<project>/domain/ and is selected via CASAN_DOMAIN_ROOT. The harness code
(packages/casan-harness/) never contains domain data — this is what makes it reusable.
Scaffold template: packages/casan-devkit/templates/domain-pack/.
Layout
apps/<project>/domain/
├── domain-pack.yaml # manifest describing this pack
├── input/
│ ├── requirement.md # FR-xx table drives the traceability gate
│ └── architecture.md # optional tech-stack/context
├── golden-runs/
│ └── <artifact>.golden.txt # baseline for drift detection (H7)
├── corpus/
│ ├── redteam-corpus.jsonl # attack vectors (H4 recall) — one JSON per line
│ ├── redteam-vectors.jsonl # vectors for benign-fp-report / redteam metrics
│ └── benign-corpus/*.txt # benign samples (H4 false-positive budget)
└── traceability-map.json # FR-xx → code files + test files (+ optional symbols/lines)
Each piece
- input/requirement.md — must contain a
| FR-xx | ... |table. The traceability gate (Plan-10) requires everyFR-xxto map to ≥1 existing code file and ≥1 test file. No secrets/PII (the H4 input scan blocks them). - golden-runs/ — a canonical "good" artifact per pipeline output.
drift-detectcompares a run against it; similarity 1.0 = no drift. Real drift detection is proven separately. - corpus/ — red-team attack vectors (scored for H4 recall) + a benign corpus (bounds the false-positive rate). Domain-specific injections make the H4 score meaningful.
- traceability-map.json —
{"FR-01": {"name": "...", "code": ["backend/src/...", {"file":"...","symbols":["Foo"],"lines":[12]}], "tests": ["..."]}}. Symbol/line refs are optional but tighten the gate. - domain-pack.yaml — documents the above + optional threshold overrides.
Wire it up
export CASAN_DOMAIN_ROOT=apps/<project>/domain
bin/casan gate # runs domain-dependent suites against your pack
domain_root is also recorded per-project in packages/casan-harness/level5/project-registry.json
so bin/casan reuse can prove multi-project reuse.
Reference example
The OKR app's own pack is the worked example: apps/okr/domain/ (golden-runs, corpus,
input, traceability-map). Copy its shape for your domain.
Toward Plan-12 (Domain Pack SDK)
Today a pack is a directory + CASAN_DOMAIN_ROOT. Plan-12 will make it fully declarative
(register a pack by manifest, no manual wiring). The domain-pack.yaml here is the seed of
that manifest.