Files
CASAN/.github/agents/protocols/auto-resolve-protocol.md
T
thanhnvandClaude Opus 4.8 36a4812ef3 refactor(structure): promote app to repo root + remove redundant workspace cruft
Standard production layout: the OKR app (was nested under AINative_OKR_CASAN5/) is now
the repository root. No more wrapper directory.

- Promote AINative_OKR_CASAN5/* -> repo root (backend/ frontend/ packages/ apps/
  .specify/ docs/ infra/ nginx/ scripts/ + configs). Merge tool dirs: .gitea (kept the
  active deploy ci.yml, added harness-ci.yml + runbooks), .claude (agents/commands +
  launch.json), .github moved up.
- Remove redundant: 00_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE, scattered root notes (FPT_CASAN_Full.md,
  tu-tuong-casan.md, casan-tu-sinh..., casan_harness_assessment.md, source-review...,
  README_CASAN5_REFINED.md), casan-next-plans/ and optimize-docs/ (competition/planning
  artifacts — roadmap + design history preserved in git log / commit messages).
- Update all references to the old layout:
  - .gitea/workflows/{ci,harness-ci}.yml, .github/workflows/{ci,deploy}.yml:
    working-directory .; drop AINative_OKR_CASAN5/ prefix; .specify/{tests,scripts}
    -> packages/casan-harness/... (.specify/logs state kept)
  - .claude/launch.json, .gitea/*-runbook.md: path prefixes
  - CLAUDE.md, README.md: docs/input -> apps/okr/domain/input
  - policy-bundle.yaml: 8 policy paths -> packages/casan-harness/...; manifest re-signed
- secrets-scan.sh: fixture excludes -> new package/domain paths.

Full gate from the new root: PASS=64 FAIL=0 SKIP=3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 13:26:36 +09:00

1.6 KiB

Auto-Resolve Protocol (No-Pause Mode)

When any [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker or ambiguity is encountered at any step:

Rule: Auto-Resolve with Optimal Assumption

  1. Identify every [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker or ambiguous item.
  2. Evaluate the best answer based on:
    • Context from the SRS document
    • Common engineering best practices for domain
    • Conservative, safe defaults (prefer explicit over implicit, standard over custom)
    • Existing patterns in the codebase (src/modules/)
  3. Choose the optimal assumption and record it with rationale.
  4. Encode the assumption directly into the document (replace marker with the resolved value).
  5. Report every resolved item in the ## [AUTO-RESOLVED] Assumptions section of the phase report.

Auto-Resolved Assumptions Report Format

Every phase report MUST include:

## [AUTO-RESOLVED] Assumptions

| # | ID | Original Question | Auto-Answer | Rationale | Confidence |
|---|----|-------------------|-------------|-----------|------------|
| 1 | TBC-01 | <original question text> | <chosen answer> | <why this was chosen> | High/Med/Low |

> ⚠  User Review Recommended: Items with Confidence=Low should be verified by the user at their convenience.

Confidence Levels

  • High — answer derived directly from SRS or existing codebase pattern, highly certain
  • Med — answer based on best practice and domain knowledge, likely correct
  • Low — answer is a reasonable guess; user should verify when convenient (pipeline continues)