Files
CASAN/.claude/agents/protocols/report-gate-protocol.md
T
thanhnvandClaude Opus 4.8 36a4812ef3 refactor(structure): promote app to repo root + remove redundant workspace cruft
Standard production layout: the OKR app (was nested under AINative_OKR_CASAN5/) is now
the repository root. No more wrapper directory.

- Promote AINative_OKR_CASAN5/* -> repo root (backend/ frontend/ packages/ apps/
  .specify/ docs/ infra/ nginx/ scripts/ + configs). Merge tool dirs: .gitea (kept the
  active deploy ci.yml, added harness-ci.yml + runbooks), .claude (agents/commands +
  launch.json), .github moved up.
- Remove redundant: 00_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE, scattered root notes (FPT_CASAN_Full.md,
  tu-tuong-casan.md, casan-tu-sinh..., casan_harness_assessment.md, source-review...,
  README_CASAN5_REFINED.md), casan-next-plans/ and optimize-docs/ (competition/planning
  artifacts — roadmap + design history preserved in git log / commit messages).
- Update all references to the old layout:
  - .gitea/workflows/{ci,harness-ci}.yml, .github/workflows/{ci,deploy}.yml:
    working-directory .; drop AINative_OKR_CASAN5/ prefix; .specify/{tests,scripts}
    -> packages/casan-harness/... (.specify/logs state kept)
  - .claude/launch.json, .gitea/*-runbook.md: path prefixes
  - CLAUDE.md, README.md: docs/input -> apps/okr/domain/input
  - policy-bundle.yaml: 8 policy paths -> packages/casan-harness/...; manifest re-signed
- secrets-scan.sh: fixture excludes -> new package/domain paths.

Full gate from the new root: PASS=64 FAIL=0 SKIP=3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 13:26:36 +09:00

4.7 KiB

Report Hard Gate Protocol

⛔ MANDATORY BEFORE NEXT STEP

After each step completes, the boss MUST enforce this gate before proceeding:

STEP N completes
    │
    ▼
[GATE A] CHECK: Are all primary artifact files physically present on disk?
    │            Use Glob tool for each path listed in artifacts: of STEP-RESULT block.
    │
    ├─ ANY MISSING → BLOCKED. Do NOT mark step COMPLETE.
    │                Re-invoke the sub-agent with explicit instruction:
    │                  "File <path> was not written. Re-generate and write it now."
    │                Write boss log: [ARTIFACT GATE] STEP N — missing: <path>. Re-invoking.
    │                (Counts against gate-retry-protocol max retries)
    │
    └─ ALL PRESENT → GATE A PASSED
                        │
                        ▼
[GATE B] CHECK: Does the phase report file EXIST?
    │
    ├─ NO → BLOCKED. Generate the report NOW using data already produced.
    │        Write boss log: [REPORT GATE] STEP N — report generated (late).
    │
    └─ YES → CHECK: Does report contain ALL required sections?
                │
                ├─ NO → ADD missing section inline. Re-write file.
                │        Write boss log: [REPORT GATE] STEP N — patched missing section: <name>.
                │
                └─ YES → CHECK: Any unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers?
                            │
                            ├─ YES → Auto-resolve every item. Patch report.
                            │        Write boss log: [REPORT GATE] STEP N — auto-resolved N TBC items.
                            │
                            └─ NO → ✅ BOTH GATES PASSED → Advance to STEP N+1

Rule: pipeline-context.yaml step status may only be set to COMPLETE after GATE A and GATE B both pass. Setting it earlier — based solely on the sub-agent's STEP-RESULT claim — is forbidden.

Required Report Sections (all steps)

  1. ## Summary — brief phase outcome
  2. ## Artifacts Produced — list of all files written (with paths)
  3. ## [AUTO-RESOLVED] Assumptions — auto-resolved clarifications
  4. ## [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] Items — remaining unresolved items (should be empty in built-in mode)
  5. ## Issues & Retries — record of rejected verdicts and retry attempts
  6. ## Next Step — what step follows and what inputs it will receive

Step-Specific Additional Sections

Step Additional Required Section
STEP 4 ## QA Summary — full table of questions + auto-resolved answers
STEP 10 ## Test Results — pass/fail table per test class, Istanbul/c8 coverage %
STEP 13 ## Launch Status — FE/BE startup, DB seed count, screen accessibility

⛔ Implementation Gate (Step 10 — CANNOT be bypassed or auto-resolved)

Before dispatching speckit.implement (Step 10), boss MUST read pipeline-context.yaml and verify:

REQUIRED statuses in pipeline-context.yaml:
  step-6-plan.status    == "COMPLETE"   → plan.md, data-model.md, contracts/ exist
  step-8-dd.status      == "COMPLETE"   → DD document exists
  step-9-tasks.status   == "COMPLETE"   → tasks.md exists
  step-8b-testcases.status == "COMPLETE" → testcase document exists

REQUIRED files on disk (verify with Glob/Read):
  docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/plan.md
  docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/data-model.md
  docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/tasks.md
  docs/output/ipa-docs/dd/dd-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
  docs/output/ipa-docs/testcase/testcase-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
  docs/output/ipa-docs/srs/srs-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
  docs/output/ipa-docs/bd/bd-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
  docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/spec.md

On failure (any check fails):

  1. Log [IMPLEMENTATION GATE BLOCKED] in boss log with list of missing items
  2. Do NOT dispatch Step 10 — no exceptions
  3. Identify the earliest incomplete step in pipeline-context.yaml
  4. Re-execute from that step forward
  5. Re-run this gate after remediation

Why this gate cannot be auto-resolved: Missing design documents mean the implementation has no spec to be traced to. Code written without SRS/BD/Plan/DD cannot be reviewed for correctness — it is untraceable and unverifiable. The entire purpose of the pipeline is this traceability chain. Auto-resolving this gate would mean shipping code with no design rationale, which defeats the pipeline entirely.

This gate applies even in mode: autonomous. "Autonomous" means no human pauses — it does NOT mean skipping required pipeline steps.