Standard production layout: the OKR app (was nested under AINative_OKR_CASAN5/) is now
the repository root. No more wrapper directory.
- Promote AINative_OKR_CASAN5/* -> repo root (backend/ frontend/ packages/ apps/
.specify/ docs/ infra/ nginx/ scripts/ + configs). Merge tool dirs: .gitea (kept the
active deploy ci.yml, added harness-ci.yml + runbooks), .claude (agents/commands +
launch.json), .github moved up.
- Remove redundant: 00_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE, scattered root notes (FPT_CASAN_Full.md,
tu-tuong-casan.md, casan-tu-sinh..., casan_harness_assessment.md, source-review...,
README_CASAN5_REFINED.md), casan-next-plans/ and optimize-docs/ (competition/planning
artifacts — roadmap + design history preserved in git log / commit messages).
- Update all references to the old layout:
- .gitea/workflows/{ci,harness-ci}.yml, .github/workflows/{ci,deploy}.yml:
working-directory .; drop AINative_OKR_CASAN5/ prefix; .specify/{tests,scripts}
-> packages/casan-harness/... (.specify/logs state kept)
- .claude/launch.json, .gitea/*-runbook.md: path prefixes
- CLAUDE.md, README.md: docs/input -> apps/okr/domain/input
- policy-bundle.yaml: 8 policy paths -> packages/casan-harness/...; manifest re-signed
- secrets-scan.sh: fixture excludes -> new package/domain paths.
Full gate from the new root: PASS=64 FAIL=0 SKIP=3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.7 KiB
Report Hard Gate Protocol
⛔ MANDATORY BEFORE NEXT STEP
After each step completes, the boss MUST enforce this gate before proceeding:
STEP N completes
│
▼
[GATE A] CHECK: Are all primary artifact files physically present on disk?
│ Use Glob tool for each path listed in artifacts: of STEP-RESULT block.
│
├─ ANY MISSING → BLOCKED. Do NOT mark step COMPLETE.
│ Re-invoke the sub-agent with explicit instruction:
│ "File <path> was not written. Re-generate and write it now."
│ Write boss log: [ARTIFACT GATE] STEP N — missing: <path>. Re-invoking.
│ (Counts against gate-retry-protocol max retries)
│
└─ ALL PRESENT → GATE A PASSED
│
▼
[GATE B] CHECK: Does the phase report file EXIST?
│
├─ NO → BLOCKED. Generate the report NOW using data already produced.
│ Write boss log: [REPORT GATE] STEP N — report generated (late).
│
└─ YES → CHECK: Does report contain ALL required sections?
│
├─ NO → ADD missing section inline. Re-write file.
│ Write boss log: [REPORT GATE] STEP N — patched missing section: <name>.
│
└─ YES → CHECK: Any unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers?
│
├─ YES → Auto-resolve every item. Patch report.
│ Write boss log: [REPORT GATE] STEP N — auto-resolved N TBC items.
│
└─ NO → ✅ BOTH GATES PASSED → Advance to STEP N+1
Rule:
pipeline-context.yamlstep status may only be set toCOMPLETEafter GATE A and GATE B both pass. Setting it earlier — based solely on the sub-agent's STEP-RESULT claim — is forbidden.
Required Report Sections (all steps)
## Summary— brief phase outcome## Artifacts Produced— list of all files written (with paths)## [AUTO-RESOLVED] Assumptions— auto-resolved clarifications## [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] Items— remaining unresolved items (should be empty in built-in mode)## Issues & Retries— record of rejected verdicts and retry attempts## Next Step— what step follows and what inputs it will receive
Step-Specific Additional Sections
| Step | Additional Required Section |
|---|---|
| STEP 4 | ## QA Summary — full table of questions + auto-resolved answers |
| STEP 10 | ## Test Results — pass/fail table per test class, Istanbul/c8 coverage % |
| STEP 13 | ## Launch Status — FE/BE startup, DB seed count, screen accessibility |
⛔ Implementation Gate (Step 10 — CANNOT be bypassed or auto-resolved)
Before dispatching speckit.implement (Step 10), boss MUST read pipeline-context.yaml and verify:
REQUIRED statuses in pipeline-context.yaml:
step-6-plan.status == "COMPLETE" → plan.md, data-model.md, contracts/ exist
step-8-dd.status == "COMPLETE" → DD document exists
step-9-tasks.status == "COMPLETE" → tasks.md exists
step-8b-testcases.status == "COMPLETE" → testcase document exists
REQUIRED files on disk (verify with Glob/Read):
docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/plan.md
docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/data-model.md
docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/tasks.md
docs/output/ipa-docs/dd/dd-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
docs/output/ipa-docs/testcase/testcase-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
docs/output/ipa-docs/srs/srs-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
docs/output/ipa-docs/bd/bd-<mod-id>-<short-name>.md
docs/output/specs/<feature-id>/spec.md
On failure (any check fails):
- Log
[IMPLEMENTATION GATE BLOCKED]in boss log with list of missing items - Do NOT dispatch Step 10 — no exceptions
- Identify the earliest incomplete step in
pipeline-context.yaml - Re-execute from that step forward
- Re-run this gate after remediation
Why this gate cannot be auto-resolved: Missing design documents mean the implementation has no spec to be traced to. Code written without SRS/BD/Plan/DD cannot be reviewed for correctness — it is untraceable and unverifiable. The entire purpose of the pipeline is this traceability chain. Auto-resolving this gate would mean shipping code with no design rationale, which defeats the pipeline entirely.
This gate applies even in
mode: autonomous. "Autonomous" means no human pauses — it does NOT mean skipping required pipeline steps.