Files
CASAN/docs/compliance/APPI_DATA_PROCESSING.md

4.2 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

APPI Data Processing and Cross-Border Assessment

Status and use

This is a customer-specific assessment template for CASAN deployments in Japan. It records facts needed for an APPI review; it does not claim that CASAN or a customer deployment is APPI-compliant. The customer’s privacy/legal owner must approve the completed version before production processing begins.

Processing inventory

Data category Typical source CASAN purpose Storage / recipient Default retention Deployment decision required
Source code and diffs Git repository, AI coding tool policy/test/security evaluation; Evidence Pack customer workspace and Evidence Pack store customer policy whether any code may leave customer network
Prompts and chat content Control Panel / AI tool governed response, routing, audit customer runtime; selected model provider only when configured customer policy provider, country/region, model and allowed fields
Secrets / credentials source, logs, environment detection/blocking only should be masked; must not be placed in Evidence Pack not retained intentionally scanner/exception procedure
Developer identifiers IdP claims, audit record RBAC, accountability, approval trace customer identity/audit store customer policy legitimate purpose, access roles
Telemetry and costs model/provider and runner FinOps, reliability, anomaly detection customer telemetry store / selected provider customer policy provider API and export destination
Evidence Pack metadata CASAN gates and manifests auditability and proof customer Evidence Pack storage; optional Gitea artifact customer policy retention, immutable-storage setting, artifact access

Required deployment register

For every customer project, complete the following fields and attach it to the PoC or production change record.

Field Value / approval
Customer data controller / privacy contact
CASAN operator and support contact
Processing purpose and affected projects
Personal information expected in source, prompts or logs
Model providers, model IDs, processing country/region
Subprocessors and service locations
Cross-border transfer assessment / required information
Retention, deletion and export schedule
Evidence Pack, backup and artifact storage location
Incident notification contacts and target timing
Approved masking / secret-scanning policy
Approval date, reviewer and next review date

CASAN control mapping

  • H4 / data-exfil guard scans prompts and artifacts before release. A BLOCK is evidence of detection, not evidence that no sensitive data was ever sent.
  • H5 audit records accountable actions and policy changes.
  • H6 records execution/cost telemetry. It must be included in the retention decision because it can identify a user, project, provider or run.
  • Evidence Pack stores summaries and hashes; it still needs a retention, access-control, backup and deletion decision.
  • Cloud-model use is opt-in at deployment time. The customer must document what fields are transmitted and select an allowed provider/region.

Data-subject and operational procedures

The operator must implement customer-approved procedures for access requests, correction/deletion/export where applicable, retention expiry, secret leak investigation, incident triage and vendor/subprocessor changes. A Gitea Actions artifact is not an immutable long-term retention system by itself.

Evidence required before a production claim

  1. Completed register for each tenant/project and model route.
  2. Network/data-flow diagram tested against the deployed configuration.
  3. Provider and subprocessor review, including cross-border transfer facts.
  4. Retention/deletion test for logs, Evidence Packs, backups and CI artifacts.
  5. Incident-response tabletop or drill with named contacts.
  6. Review by the customer’s Japanese privacy/legal owner.

Reference

Use the authoritative Japanese APPI text and Personal Information Protection Commission guidance for the final legal assessment. English translations and this template are working aids only; they are not the controlling legal text.